Talk:The Monkey King's Daughter

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.themonkeykingsdaughter.com. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2009122710002613.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

CorenSearchBot is in error.

The descriptive content is from The Monkey Kings Daughter website http://www.themonkeykingsdaughter.com, and I am the copyright owner of all content on that site.

I give my permission for Wikipedia to use this descriptive content.

Not sure what else to say or how to resolve this listing in Wikipedia, but would like to see my entry online asap. Thanks

Hulijing1234 (talk) 21:48, 26 December 2009 (UTC)T. A. DeBonis 26 DEC 09 info@themonkeyking'sdaughter.com[reply]

This is not sufficient. While I have no reason to dote that you are who you say you are, anyone could claim to be the owner if any site -- we can't simply accept such statements. If the copied content belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. (In general this means either placing a license statement on the external site itself, or sending an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org from an account clearly connected with the site.) If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

However, even with copyright permissions granted, the text that was formerly on this article reads like an advertisement, and so would not be acceptable without rewriting. Article text must be neutral and unbiased. Also if this is your book, you should read our conflict of interest guideline before trying to re-create the article. People in general are discouraged from writing about their own work. Moreover, any article would need to demonstrate that the book is notable. See our notability guideline for books. Yon should provide citations of or links to independent, reliable sources that discuss the book in a non-trivial way, or provide other evidence of notability. If this can not be done, an article about the book will probably be deleted sooner or later. DES ^(talk) 22:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

As the discussion on dletion was closed as keep, I removed 2 references which did not add anything to the article just proved its notable. WikiHannibal (talk) 00:56, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]