Jump to content

User talk:Volgabulgari

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Volgabulgari (talk | contribs) at 14:47, 11 May 2023 (Undid revision 1154296847 by Volgabulgari (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Kamista per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bulgaryani. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Mz7 (talk) 08:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Volgabulgari (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear, @Mz7
I am writing to request an unblock of my account on Wikipedia. My account was recently blocked due to "Sockpuppet", but I believe that the block was unjustified and would like to explain my position.
Firstly, I would like to apologize for any actions or statements that may have violated Wikipedia's policies. The problem is I am both unaware of "Sockpuppet concept" and i have zero intention to do political edits. Also, i'd like to note i don't use these accounts for political needs. Beofore i get banned I wasn't even know what sockpuppet means. I understand that the use of multiple accounts can be a violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I want to assure you that I did not intend to deceive or manipulate the editing process in any way. I created the second account in order to point out Oghuric/Hunno-Bulgar languages. I thought user Beshoghur and Austronesier deleting my edits because they hated me. That's why I wanted to use another account. Still, Kamista is older than this so essentially i did not create account for edit.
Secondly, I would like to provide additional context and evidence that I believe may shed light on the situation. For instance, I've been editing Chuvash page for 1-2 years. It has still my contributions a lot. And they weren't bad. I'd like to do more. Most of my edits deleted because I banned but they were pretty academic and accurate. For instance, User:ActivelyDisinterested just deleted my edits even though it was better than older one.[1] user Nishidani also deleted me edits in Khazars just because I banned. But there is no any single misleading in the page. Please look If you remove my ban I'll revert these and probably be unactive for a very very long time if it's not forever. I see that my actions were misguided and not in keeping with Wikipedia's standards for transparency and accountability. I have reviewed Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and am confident that I can make positive contributions to the website by removing by reverts and I'll go.
I never made an unblock request until now. Because I understood it was something about rules. And even though I'm not very well aware of them, I accepted this block. However, deleting my other accounts for editing contents is definetly unjust. It was for nothing. And I am here for unblock request for this account. Not because I'd like to do more edits but because I want to remove the meaningless reverts.
Have a nice day.
Volgabulgari (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=:Dear, @[[User:Mz7|Mz7]] :I am writing to request an '''unblock of my account''' on Wikipedia. My account was recently blocked due to "''Sockpuppet''", but I believe that the block was unjustified and would like to explain my position. :Firstly, I would like to apologize for any actions or statements that may have violated Wikipedia's policies. The problem is I am both unaware of "Sockpuppet concept" and i have zero intention to do political edits. Also, i'd like to note i don't use these accounts for political needs. Beofore i get banned I wasn't even know what sockpuppet means. I understand that the use of multiple accounts can be a violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I want to assure you that I did not intend to deceive or manipulate the editing process in any way. I created the second account in order to point out Oghuric/Hunno-Bulgar languages. I thought user Beshoghur and Austronesier deleting my edits because they hated me. That's why I wanted to use another account. Still, Kamista is older than this so essentially i did not create account for edit. :Secondly, I would like to provide additional context and evidence that I believe may shed light on the situation. For instance, I've been editing Chuvash page for 1-2 years. It has still my contributions a lot. And they weren't bad. I'd like to do more. Most of my edits deleted because I banned but they were pretty academic and accurate. For instance, [[User:ActivelyDisinterested]] just deleted my edits even though it was better than older one.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chuvash_people&oldid=1153123665] user Nishidani also deleted me edits in Khazars just because I banned. But there is no any single misleading in the page. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khazars&oldid=1152618179 Please look] If you remove my ban I'll revert these and probably be unactive for a very very long time if it's not forever. I see that my actions were misguided and not in keeping with Wikipedia's standards for transparency and accountability. I have reviewed Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and am confident that I can make positive contributions to the website by removing by reverts and I'll go. :I never made an '''unblock request''' until now. Because I understood it was something about rules. And even though I'm not very well aware of them, I accepted this block. However, deleting my other accounts for editing contents is definetly unjust. It was for nothing. And I am here for unblock request for this account. Not because I'd like to do more edits but because I want to remove the meaningless reverts. :Have a nice day. : [[User:Volgabulgari|Volgabulgari]] ([[User talk:Volgabulgari#top|talk]]) 10:56, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=:Dear, @[[User:Mz7|Mz7]] :I am writing to request an '''unblock of my account''' on Wikipedia. My account was recently blocked due to "''Sockpuppet''", but I believe that the block was unjustified and would like to explain my position. :Firstly, I would like to apologize for any actions or statements that may have violated Wikipedia's policies. The problem is I am both unaware of "Sockpuppet concept" and i have zero intention to do political edits. Also, i'd like to note i don't use these accounts for political needs. Beofore i get banned I wasn't even know what sockpuppet means. I understand that the use of multiple accounts can be a violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I want to assure you that I did not intend to deceive or manipulate the editing process in any way. I created the second account in order to point out Oghuric/Hunno-Bulgar languages. I thought user Beshoghur and Austronesier deleting my edits because they hated me. That's why I wanted to use another account. Still, Kamista is older than this so essentially i did not create account for edit. :Secondly, I would like to provide additional context and evidence that I believe may shed light on the situation. For instance, I've been editing Chuvash page for 1-2 years. It has still my contributions a lot. And they weren't bad. I'd like to do more. Most of my edits deleted because I banned but they were pretty academic and accurate. For instance, [[User:ActivelyDisinterested]] just deleted my edits even though it was better than older one.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chuvash_people&oldid=1153123665] user Nishidani also deleted me edits in Khazars just because I banned. But there is no any single misleading in the page. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khazars&oldid=1152618179 Please look] If you remove my ban I'll revert these and probably be unactive for a very very long time if it's not forever. I see that my actions were misguided and not in keeping with Wikipedia's standards for transparency and accountability. I have reviewed Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and am confident that I can make positive contributions to the website by removing by reverts and I'll go. :I never made an '''unblock request''' until now. Because I understood it was something about rules. And even though I'm not very well aware of them, I accepted this block. However, deleting my other accounts for editing contents is definetly unjust. It was for nothing. And I am here for unblock request for this account. Not because I'd like to do more edits but because I want to remove the meaningless reverts. :Have a nice day. : [[User:Volgabulgari|Volgabulgari]] ([[User talk:Volgabulgari#top|talk]]) 10:56, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=:Dear, @[[User:Mz7|Mz7]] :I am writing to request an '''unblock of my account''' on Wikipedia. My account was recently blocked due to "''Sockpuppet''", but I believe that the block was unjustified and would like to explain my position. :Firstly, I would like to apologize for any actions or statements that may have violated Wikipedia's policies. The problem is I am both unaware of "Sockpuppet concept" and i have zero intention to do political edits. Also, i'd like to note i don't use these accounts for political needs. Beofore i get banned I wasn't even know what sockpuppet means. I understand that the use of multiple accounts can be a violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I want to assure you that I did not intend to deceive or manipulate the editing process in any way. I created the second account in order to point out Oghuric/Hunno-Bulgar languages. I thought user Beshoghur and Austronesier deleting my edits because they hated me. That's why I wanted to use another account. Still, Kamista is older than this so essentially i did not create account for edit. :Secondly, I would like to provide additional context and evidence that I believe may shed light on the situation. For instance, I've been editing Chuvash page for 1-2 years. It has still my contributions a lot. And they weren't bad. I'd like to do more. Most of my edits deleted because I banned but they were pretty academic and accurate. For instance, [[User:ActivelyDisinterested]] just deleted my edits even though it was better than older one.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chuvash_people&oldid=1153123665] user Nishidani also deleted me edits in Khazars just because I banned. But there is no any single misleading in the page. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khazars&oldid=1152618179 Please look] If you remove my ban I'll revert these and probably be unactive for a very very long time if it's not forever. I see that my actions were misguided and not in keeping with Wikipedia's standards for transparency and accountability. I have reviewed Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and am confident that I can make positive contributions to the website by removing by reverts and I'll go. :I never made an '''unblock request''' until now. Because I understood it was something about rules. And even though I'm not very well aware of them, I accepted this block. However, deleting my other accounts for editing contents is definetly unjust. It was for nothing. And I am here for unblock request for this account. Not because I'd like to do more edits but because I want to remove the meaningless reverts. :Have a nice day. : [[User:Volgabulgari|Volgabulgari]] ([[User talk:Volgabulgari#top|talk]]) 10:56, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Request of an unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Volgabulgari (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear, @Mz7

I would like to offer a sincere apology once again for my past actions involving sockpuppetry. As an individual who values the principles of academic integrity and transparency, I understand that my behavior was completely unacceptable and violated the trust that the community has placed in me. I guarantee that after some edits I will not use Wikipedia anymore for a very long time if it's not forever.

In past days, I read sockpuppetry article in Wikipedia, I have not only deceived others, but also compromised the integrity of the content on this platform. I am deeply sorry for the harm and disruption that my actions may have caused to the community.

I fully understand that my actions were in direct violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I am committed to never engaging in such behavior again. Moving forward, I will abide by the highest standards of integrity and professionalism in all my interactions on this platform. If you give me a chance, you can check for my last edits for a week, then I will be inactive or dead.

I would like to express my deepest apologies to the Wikipedia community and pledge to regain your trust through my future actions. Thank you for your attention and understanding. I don't want to create new accounts, editing same thing. Right now I am "personally banned" as another admin told.

"Instead of creating new accounts to edit, you need to successfully request an unblock first."

Volgabulgari (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=:Dear, @[[User:Mz7|Mz7]] I would like to offer a sincere apology once again for my past actions involving sockpuppetry. As an individual who values the principles of academic integrity and transparency, I understand that my behavior was completely unacceptable and violated the trust that the community has placed in me. I guarantee that after some edits I will not use Wikipedia anymore for a very long time if it's not forever. In past days, I read sockpuppetry article in Wikipedia, I have not only deceived others, but also compromised the integrity of the content on this platform. I am deeply sorry for the harm and disruption that my actions may have caused to the community. I fully understand that my actions were in direct violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I am committed to never engaging in such behavior again. Moving forward, I will abide by the highest standards of integrity and professionalism in all my interactions on this platform. If you give me a chance, you can check for my last edits for a week, then I will be inactive or dead. I would like to express my deepest apologies to the Wikipedia community and pledge to regain your trust through my future actions. Thank you for your attention and understanding. I don't want to create new accounts, editing same thing. Right now I am "personally banned" as another admin told. "Instead of creating new accounts to edit, you need to successfully request an unblock first." : [[User:Volgabulgari|Volgabulgari]] ([[User talk:Volgabulgari#top|talk]]) 10:56, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=:Dear, @[[User:Mz7|Mz7]] I would like to offer a sincere apology once again for my past actions involving sockpuppetry. As an individual who values the principles of academic integrity and transparency, I understand that my behavior was completely unacceptable and violated the trust that the community has placed in me. I guarantee that after some edits I will not use Wikipedia anymore for a very long time if it's not forever. In past days, I read sockpuppetry article in Wikipedia, I have not only deceived others, but also compromised the integrity of the content on this platform. I am deeply sorry for the harm and disruption that my actions may have caused to the community. I fully understand that my actions were in direct violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I am committed to never engaging in such behavior again. Moving forward, I will abide by the highest standards of integrity and professionalism in all my interactions on this platform. If you give me a chance, you can check for my last edits for a week, then I will be inactive or dead. I would like to express my deepest apologies to the Wikipedia community and pledge to regain your trust through my future actions. Thank you for your attention and understanding. I don't want to create new accounts, editing same thing. Right now I am "personally banned" as another admin told. "Instead of creating new accounts to edit, you need to successfully request an unblock first." : [[User:Volgabulgari|Volgabulgari]] ([[User talk:Volgabulgari#top|talk]]) 10:56, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=:Dear, @[[User:Mz7|Mz7]] I would like to offer a sincere apology once again for my past actions involving sockpuppetry. As an individual who values the principles of academic integrity and transparency, I understand that my behavior was completely unacceptable and violated the trust that the community has placed in me. I guarantee that after some edits I will not use Wikipedia anymore for a very long time if it's not forever. In past days, I read sockpuppetry article in Wikipedia, I have not only deceived others, but also compromised the integrity of the content on this platform. I am deeply sorry for the harm and disruption that my actions may have caused to the community. I fully understand that my actions were in direct violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I am committed to never engaging in such behavior again. Moving forward, I will abide by the highest standards of integrity and professionalism in all my interactions on this platform. If you give me a chance, you can check for my last edits for a week, then I will be inactive or dead. I would like to express my deepest apologies to the Wikipedia community and pledge to regain your trust through my future actions. Thank you for your attention and understanding. I don't want to create new accounts, editing same thing. Right now I am "personally banned" as another admin told. "Instead of creating new accounts to edit, you need to successfully request an unblock first." : [[User:Volgabulgari|Volgabulgari]] ([[User talk:Volgabulgari#top|talk]]) 10:56, 4 May 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Volgabulgari (talk) 11:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]