User talk:Firefighter3932

Welcome!

Hello, Firefighter3932! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!

Brookie :) { - like the mist - there one moment and then gone!} (Whisper...)

17:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Firefighter3932

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jehovah's Witnesses, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Stop harassing me.[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 15:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Stop harassing me.[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk: Theroadislong. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 17:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Please site the source where that editor was making personal threats to me. If you feel you are being harassed, first and foremost, act calmly (even if difficult). It is hard to over-emphasize this.[reply]

In serious cases or where privacy and off-wiki aspects are an issue (e.g., where private personal information is a part of the issue, or on-wiki issues spread to email and 'real world' harassment, or similar), you can contact the Arbitration Committee.

For simpler, on-wiki matters, such as a user with whom you have arguments, see dispute resolution as the usual first step. It makes it easier to identify the problem you are having if there are some specific diffs. For more serious cases where you are willing to address it on-wiki, you may request administrative assistance. (Do not open a discussion about outing on behalf of a third party without the victim's permission, unless the relevant page revisions have already been oversighted. It is important not to make violations of privacy more severe.)

Note: If other editors have concerns over your editing, then you will quite likely gain attention from administrators and other concerned users as a result. Any civil and appropriate comments addressed by them to you would not be considered harassment.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 18:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing prohibited material such as libel, personal details, or violations of copyright, living persons, banning, or anti-promotional policies Removing harmful posts, including personal attacks, trolling, and vandalism.Firefighter3932 (talk) 18:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not necessary to bring talk pages to publishing standardsFirefighter3932 (talk) 18:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. Scr★pIron^IV 18:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"If you have taken all other reasonable steps to resolve the dispute, and the dispute is not over the content of an article, you can request arbitration. Be prepared to show that you tried to resolve the dispute by other means. Arbitration differs from mediation in that the Arbitration Committee will consider the case and issue a decision, instead of merely assisting the parties in reaching an agreement. If the issue is decided by arbitration, you will be expected to abide by the result. If the case involves serious user misconduct, arbitration may result in a number of serious consequences up to totally banning someone from editing, as laid out in the arbitration policy. Note that arbitration is normally for disputes about user conduct, while mediation is normally for disputes about article content." I did all I can do to fix this. This is what has to happen now.Firefighter3932 (talk) 19:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing.Firefighter3932 (talk) 18:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Final warning: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited materialFirefighter3932 (talk) 18:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. Scr★pIronIV 18:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)" Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

"Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jehovah's Witnesses, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC) " Harassment (/həˈræsmənt/ or /ˈhærəsmənt/) covers a wide range of behaviours of an offensive nature. It is commonly understood as behaviour that disturbs or upsets, and it is characteristically repetitive. In the legal sense, it is behaviour that appears to be disturbing or threatening.Firefighter3932 (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Firefighter3932 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a firefighter who is here to help improve this site. i will limit my edits and i will use sources in the future. Firefighter3932 (talk) 17:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, you may indeed be a firefighter; but, if you are you are, you are not using your expertise for the benefit of Wikipedia. I see no basis for thinking that unblocking you would benefit the Project. To start to regain confidence why not select an article that needs expansion and post, here, substantial and well sourced additional text? See WP:FIRST, WP:RS and WP:CITE. Just Chilling (talk) 22:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So you were improving the site with this edit, too? Max Semenik (talk) 20:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That was the first one that that cause this promlem. i have since been told that are are rules for even Talk pages. now i know.Firefighter3932 (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give some time to recover from my on-duty injuries? Then i can help you with that Article. Thank you for your support.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Raymond_Myles

Raymond Myles (c. 1954 - April 10, 2017) was an Illinois state judge residing in Chicago who presided over a number of noted cases. He was murdered in a shooting in front of his home on April 10, big butt 17.

Myles was involved in the case against William Balfour, who was convicted of killing singer and actress Jennifer Hudson's mother, brother and 7-year-old nephew, CNN affiliate WGN reported.

The judge was also involved in the case of the 1993 massacre at a Brown's Chicken fast food restaurant in Palatine, Illinois, WGN reported.[1]

Raymond Myles (c. 1954 - April 10, 2017) was an Illinois state judge residing in Chicago who presided over a number of noted cases. He was murdered in a shooting in front of his home on April 10, 2017.

Myles was involved in the case against William Balfour, who was convicted of killing singer and actress Jennifer Hudson's mother, brother and 7-year-old nephew, CNN affiliate WGN reported.

The judge was also involved in the case of the 1993 massacre at a Brown's Chicken fast food restaurant in Palatine, Illinois, WGN reported.[1]Firefighter3932 (talk) 20:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source: http://time.com/4737581/raymond-myles-shooting-death-joshua-smith-charged/Firefighter3932 (talk) 20:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Firefighter3932 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a firefighter who is here to help improve this site. i can only edit a little while i recover. Above is one edit. Firefighter3932 (talk) 20:49, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

From your edit "home on April 10, big butt 17." Big butt? PhilKnight (talk) 22:33, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Im am the on that wrote 2017. Someone else wrote Big butt on the article. I cant fix it until im am unblocked. i think you misunderstood.i was told above to post my next edit to get unblocked. i linked the article and my source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firefighter3932 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What else do i have too do?Firefighter3932 (talk) 20:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midazolam#Use_in_executions I would reword and add this: Kenneth Williams is executed at the Cummins Unit, Arkansas, by injection of midazolam, marking the state's fourth execution within eight days before the drug passes its expiration date. (NBC News)Firefighter3932 (talk) 15:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Bahawalpur_explosion needs a lot of workFirefighter3932 (talk) 13:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Philadelphia_Police_Department_officers_who_died_in_the_line_of_duty Robert Wilson III was a Police Officer promoted posthumously to Sergeant.Firefighter3932 (talk) 21:22, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Barker diedFirefighter3932 (talk) 16:28, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Firefighter3932 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

=I am a firefighter who is here to help improve this site. i can only edit on my page right now. Firefighter3932 (talk) 16:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.