Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Human rights/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

→

Archive 12

Proposed Entry: Gender Inequality in China

Hello Everybody! As you are well aware, the WP: human rights seeks to create and manage a comprehensive and structured set of well-written articles on human rights. I plan to create a new Wikipedia entry on Gender Inequality in China and would like to add it to the Wikiproject human rights. I also plan to add an overview on the “Gender Inequality Across the Globe” subsection on the Gender inequality main page. Gender inequality is a significant issue with greatly affects the rights given to individuals. In China human rights are restricted in various dimensions, for example, twenty-five percent of the women who successfully gain employment must face the possibility of being forced to sign a contract prohibiting them from getting pregnant or married. An entry on gender inequality in China would be an appropriate addition to the WP: human rights. My new entry will use numerous scholarly resources to provide a comprehensive and well-written discussion of the following subsections: legislation, cultural and societal norms, and implications in regards to family structure, education, healthcare, and employment. I hope that other contributors will continue my contributions by adding subsections including but not limited to, the history of gender inequality and the impacts of gender inequality on sexuality. If you have any suggestions for the execution of my proposed entry, please let me know. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated! Thank you. Nqogu (talk) 17:16, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Honour Killings in Pakistan

Hello all, I am editing and expanding the article on "Honour Killings in Pakistan." I am also adding minor edits to main "Honors Killings" article.

In defense of the universality of human rights, the role of the modern nation-state is to ensure full protection of these rights. However, the prevalence of honor killings in Pakistan underscores the Pakistani’s systematic government failure in ensuring this fundamental prescription of human rights.

The current articles focus on the universal phenomenon of honor killings worldwide almost in a generic fashion, but it is important to be as culturally and country-specific as possible when constructing explanations for why and how honor killings persist. For example, in the article on "Honour Killings in Pakistan," I am hoping to include a section on the Pakistan legal system to show how government indifference to honor killings and gender bias in Pakistani law facilitate and spurs the likelihood of violence against women.

Furthermore, the current sources on both articles are of the journalistic variety. I am hoping to include more scholarly sources.

I would be grateful for any feedback and I am excited to contribute to this page.

Saimatoppa (talk) 17:42, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello

Hi, I'm Danielle. I am relatively new to Wikipedia, but I plan on editing and expanding the Uganda Conflict Action Network article. So far there is only one vague paragraph and no citations, so I'm going to do some research and try to make it a lot better

danni1125 (talk) 16:54, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Freedom House: Second opinions requested

Please review recent edits at Freedom House.

Thanks!  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 22:48, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi KW, Can you be more specific about what's in dispute? Comparing your reversions to the text on the left here [1], I have to say that the left-hand column appears to both a bit more grammatically correct as well as slightly more NPOV... people "state" things instead of "claiming" them, etc. (I'm always wary of having one side "claim".) But given the number of small changes you've made, I may be missing the nub of the issue. Khazar2 (talk) 00:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Given my having reverted 3 other editors, the anti-canvassing guidelines prohibit me from leaving a non-neutral message.

However, to avoid being coy, I shall just state facts: my recent edits contain edit summaries or page messages that raise concerns about OR by synthesis, inadequate documentation of claims (Verifiability), others' edit summaries, etc. An earlier editor raised a concern about a student incorporating his or her essay into the article. Please exercise independent judgment about any and all of these issues.

I left a message at a respected editor who has previously complained about double standards in WP:articles about U.S. foreign policy, as an additional check on my recent edits.

Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 00:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Khazar, KW. I think it's mostly about these four recent KW's edits: [2][3][4][5]. Thanks, FeelSunny (talk) 01:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

FWIW, my take: I do agree that the unsourced CIA contention needed to go--that one seems like a no-brainer. The statistics about Freedom House funding by the US government seems like it ought to be included, but it's probably better if it were couched in someone else's "voice" rather than taken directly from a primary source; while accurate, it does raise minor original research concerns to me. It appears to me in any case that the criticism section does a good job of covering that Chomsky, Cuba, and others have made this contention--surely one of them has quoted these figures? The exact details, however, seem better suited to the criticism section than the lede.

Does that address the major bones of contention here? All that said, I know very little about this organization, so please take all the above with a grain of salt--it's just the first reaction of a passing editor. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 01:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Khazar and colleagues!

As I was reverting 3 editors (who have made each either one large or 5 consecutive significant edits), I thought that asking for a second opinion was consistent with WP's consensus-seeking ethos. I agree that the citations to recent primary sources should be added following a (perhaps dated) secondary reliable source, since such sources have been included in the article before. I expected to have problems with the editor preceding FeelSunny, frankly....  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 07:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Mohamed Nasheed

Mohamed Nasheed is in serious need of an article overhaul. He's a former prisoner of conscience and a former president of the Maldives who resigned in February of this year--possibly at military gunpoint, possibly not. He's also the subject of a major upcoming documentary The Island President, which is about to get nationwide distribution in the US. All this is causing his article to get a lot of attention from vandals and drive-by partisans, but not the real rewriting that it needs. I'm working to make some improvements... can anyone else pitch in? Thanks all! Khazar2 (talk) 02:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Free Highbeam Accounts

The internet research database HighBeam Research has 1000 free accounts available. HighBeam has full versions of tens of millions of newspaper articles and journals and should be a big help in adding reliable sources--especially older and paywalled ones--into the encyclopedia. Sign-ups require a 1-year old account with 1000 edits on any Wikipedia. Here's the link to the project page: http://enwp.org/WP:HighBeam (account sign-ups are linked in the box on the right). Feel free to sign up to help improve your work on this project's articles. CarolMooreDC 14:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Key article missing: human rights movement

See Talk:Human_rights#Human_rights_movement. I created a redirect at human rights movement, but this article is very much needed as a stand alone. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 16:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Would your suggested article present this as a single human rights movement, a unified movement for universal human rights? I'm curious to hear how you would lay out the article. There are so many small human rights movements on particular issues or focused on particular regions. Of course there is the universal declaration of human rights, and there is growing consciousness around the world for the need to protect human rights, so framing it as a global movement could be interesting. Could you lay out some specifics of how you see the article? —Zujine|talk 18:07, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Globalization proposal

Hi WikiProject Human rights members, A few of us are trying to get a WikiProject Globalization up and running. Members of this project would work together to improve the quality of articles on Wikipedia on Globalization, global issues and related topics. If you're interested in globalization, please come by and check out our proposal. We'd appreciate any feedback about our ideas, and of course your support if you were interested in lending it. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 11:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Human Rights by Region

I just checked the Human Rights Stubs category page, and I noticed this long list of "Human Rights in _____" articles. Some make sense, and should be expanded, but the one that caught my attention was Human rights in Asia. Asia is such a broad category that I don't know if you could have an article that is complete. Similarly with Africa, I think that the issues are as varied as the cultures of those continents, and it is dangerous to over-generalise, which is what those articles would be bound to do if developed further. Perhaps these could be turned into list pages where we simply link to all the specific issue-related articles within those regions.

I bring this up because of the large number of stubs in this category of articles and because the titles have such an authoritative sound to them, as in they seem like a page you should be able to find a lot of information. —Zujine|talk 19:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Human rights and Eurovision

A discussion is ongoing about whether news coverage of human rights issues related to Eurovision should be added to the article. Opinions welcome at Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2012. Khazar2 (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Globalization

The article Globalization has undergone major re-structuring. WikiProject Human rights members are invited to review and comment on the article and add relevant missing information or sections in which your project may have an interest. Also, you may be interested in reviewing the updated Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Globalization proposal for a new WikiProject. Regards, Meclee (talk) 14:47, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2011

Hi. The Wikimedia Foundation received a courtesy notice from the United States Department of State advising that their 2011 Human Rights Reports for 199 countries have been released. Naturally, they imagine we might be interested in the information or links for potential inclusion in Wikipedia articles: [6]. (They have similar reports related to Human Rights here.)

The person who contacted us noted that many articles don't seem to address human rights issues on countries and adds that "Given the prominence that discussions of human rights in global affairs, I would respectfully submit that it’s worth a chapter heading for major countries."

Since the Wikimedia Foundation does not create or curate content in the articles, this is, of course, a community matter. I'm passing along the information to your project and a few others (Wikipedia:WikiProject Countries; Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations; Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics) in case you find the information useful or in case her suggestion spurs discussion. If there's a better place that you know of, please feel free to pass it on. :)

Thanks! --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 15:02, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Very helpful, thanks. Khazar2 (talk) 15:20, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, worth adding a human rights section for most countries, I would think. Naturally, we'd need sources beyond the US State Dept., but combining Amnesty, UN, and some other reports we could make significant improvements. —Zujine|talk 14:30, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Reviewers needed for Featured Article nomination

An article from this project is nominated for Featured Article status: Smith Act trials of Communist Party leaders. To assist the process, visit its FA review page to add comments, or register support/oppose sentiments. Cheers. --Noleander (talk) 00:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

New WikiProject Globalization

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Globalization is a new project to improve Wikipedia's coverage of aspects of Globalization and the organization of information and articles on this topic. This page and its subpages contain their suggestions and various resources; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians interested in the topic. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Meclee (talk) 18:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

"Human rights in Country X" articles

I've been pondering taking on the project of improving some of Wikipedia's "Human rights in Country X" articles. My impression is that these articles are often rather patchwork, listing a few cases or issues of interest to a particular editor, but often not doing a good job of a general overview, especially in giving a historical view of the topic. (Logically, the article on "Human rights in Kuwait" should treat the subject from Kuwait's independence to the present, unless there's some way to break it up by chronological periods, changes of govt, etc.)

But it's a daunting task. Have any of you tackled one of these before, or can you recommend a model "Human rights in Country X" article that I can work from? Is it sufficient to stick to reports by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Freedom House, etc. as a starting point--or does relying on only Western-based groups already make a non-neutral view? Any feedback would be welcome.-- Khazar2 (talk) 04:56, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

And as an aside, my wife and I have a baby due any day now; if I suddenly disappear from this conversation at any point, you'll know what happened. =) -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:56, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

The #Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2011 (US Dept of State reports, etc.) benzband (talk) 08:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Archiving

Looks like 2011 could be archived but given current configuration, I'm not sure how to do it. Anyone know? Thanks. CarolMooreDC 15:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Request feedback and re-rating Right to food

The right to food article has undergone a substantial metamorphosis over the past few months (since May). I think a new rating may be appropriate and, in fact, I'd like to see this becoming a Good Article, perhaps even a Featured Article, because, I think, this may be one of the most important topics of the 20th and 21st centuries. However, this would require help from and commitment by other editors. At any rate feedback by others is very welcome. Thanks--Gulpen (talk) 14:41, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

That seems like a terrific goal. I'll try to have a look later today or tomorrow--many thanks for your efforts. Khazar2 (talk) 15:55, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Nabeel Rajab GAN

The article Nabeel Rajab has been nominated for Good article status. Interested editor can start review process by clicking here. Mohamed CJ (talk) 00:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Soviet dissidents

The category Category:Soviet dissidents is currently defined as those who openly protested the political structure of the Soviet regime until multi-party liberalisation in the 1980s. There are several things which bother me in this definition, the first one is the following:

the article Soviet dissidents says the term is most commonly applied to the dissidents of the post-Stalin era. Most of the people listed in the category were indeed active in the post-Stalin (in fact, Brezhnev) era.

Should we change the definition in Category:Soviet dissidents accordingly?

Thanks for the advise, Sasha (talk) 14:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Is it incorrect to use it for a Stalin-era dissident, then? What would be an example of someone who would be removed from the category if we redefined it? Thanks, Khazar2 (talk) 14:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

The reason for the note I posted here is a discussion I had with Span about whether Osip Mandelstam is correctly categorified as dissident (he died around 1938). Sasha (talk) 15:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

In that specific case, I'm not sure he would qualify as a dissident simply because he does not appear to have criticized the government--at least, not according to his article. But generally I would say that any person in the Soviet Union who was a dissident would fall under this category. Though it appears that the term originated in the 40s/50s rather than the 30s, "dissident" is commonly used now for this type of figure (a critic of a totalitarian regime) regardless of place and time. Just my two cents. Khazar2 (talk) 16:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! What bothers me is the discrepancy between the article and the category. Do I understand correctly is that you suggest to update the former rather than the latter? Sasha (talk) 16:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

The current phrasing (" most commonly applied") seems to leave it open to the possibility that it can be used in other situations, too. But I have no objection if you want to tinker with it. Khazar2 (talk) 16:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

thanks for the help! Sasha (talk) 18:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Warsaw concentration camp images up for deletion

File:Ges-n1.jpg and File:Ges bunkier.jpg are up for deletion -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 19:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

You might be better off posting at Wikipedia talk:Public domain image resources or another such board; this appears to be more issue of copyright law than an area for human rights expertise. Khazar2 (talk) 20:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

AfD of Protection of Women against Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill, 2010

Feel free to take a look and share your thoughts here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protection of Women against Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill, 2010 -- SarahStierch (talk) 15:54, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Discussions

There are currently discussions about deleting an article and a category about Islam and censorship here and here. My very best wishes (talk) 23:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Sex Workers' Rights

I propose editing the current article Sex Workers' Rights because, as it currently stands, it is not comprehensive and all-encompassing of the movement. My contributions would generally include an expansion in all of the sections so that they give a better synopsis of the multiple aspects of sex workers' rights. I also would like to add a section pertaining to the specific dangers that sex workers' face and a disease/prevention section. Furthermore, the current article needs a section about oppositions and criticisms of the movement so that future readers can understand what sex workers are fighting for and why the opposition is not in favor of them having rights. This would help bring neutrality to the article. Some of the sources I am looking into using include: an interview of a sex worker by Janice Raymond,the Prostitution Pro Con website, "Sex Workers and Sexual Assault: The Hidden Crime" by Julie Robinson and Bridgett Madeline, and many more. I also found sources related to disease prevention in sex work and particular instances of the abuses of sex workers' rights. Finally, I think that the Dominatrix Employment Issues is a really important aspect of sex work that deserves attention. However, it is difficult to find information about this particular area. Could you all recommend potential sources to help expand upon this area? Also, is there anything else you think I can do to improve the quality of this article? Feedback about additional resources in general would really be appreciated. Thanks!Lgriffin92 (talk) 03:30, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the project! Sounds good, Lgriffin. One potential trap to avoid is to make sure that you don't limit your sources to any one country or region--in other words, to make sure that your sources are discussing sex workers in Asia, Europe, Africa, etc. Since this is the global article, it's important that it maintain somewhat balanced coverage. Khazar2 (talk) 11:30, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Diseases of poverty

I will be editing and adding contributions to the Wikipedia page Diseases of poverty. I believe that this fits into the Wikiproject human rights because disparities of health and the conditions of poverty affect human rights and capabilities. This contribution will expand on diseases of poverty, to include those diseases affecting the United States, as well as disparities in access to health care between the rich and the poor, and the impact of a lack of resources such as clean water. I will also expand the section dedicated to HIV and AIDS. For this article I will use information from research by Eileen Steelwagon and Peter. J Hortez as well as data from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institute of Health. I will be contributing these additions as part of an extensive class assignment. My aim is simply to improve the knowledge base and to help to increase the quality of this page.

I welcome any recommendations for further edits as well as credible sources of information. I also welcome and tips for raising the quality of the overall page.Bellechic (talk) 04:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Welcome! I think an expansion of HIV and AIDS would be useful here, but I'm more hesitant about your focus on the US. Right now the article is not very country-specific, so it would potentially stand out to have a focus. Not that there are no diseases of poverty in the US, but does the US have a higher incidence of "diseases of poverty" than Brazil, China, Russia, Indonesia, Nigeria, or dozens of other countries we could list here? I think it's important to keep a global balance in this article, both in its sources and its content.

An alternative if you're primarily interested in covering the US would be to create a spinoff article called "Diseases of Poverty in the United States"; I've no doubt there would be enough sources to support such an article. Good luck! Khazar2 (talk) 11:38, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Human Trafficking in Greece

I am planning on doing some work on the page on Human Trafficking in Greece. The current article has been flagged for multiple issues, including lack of neutrality and depending too much on a single source. The current page draws its information entirely from the 2010 Trafficking in Persons Report from the U.S.Department of State, which could lead to a large bias. The current article is not very thorough. It also needs general cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.

I plan on fixing these issues by thoroughly and systematically exploring human trafficking in Greece by restructuring and rewriting the current page and adding a substantial amount of new material from a variety of reputable sources. I plan on organizing the new material into a much more reader-friendly format. Additionally, as the current article draws from a single source, it looks at human trafficking in Greece solely from a legal perspective, so I plan on broadening the current scope of the article to other important aspects of human trafficking in Greece, such as types of trafficking in Greece, causes and driving factors of trafficking in Greece, current governmental anti-trafficking efforts, and critiques of that effort. Also, I plan to add more information to the current headings about specific legislation in Greece related to human trafficking.

A more detailed look at my planned changes is available on the talk page for Human Trafficking in Greece, but I wanted to let everyone know and ask for feedback, suggestions, and criticisms on how to better this page. I really want to contribute a quality article that is clearly laid-out and readable with relevant information on the topic. As someone new to the editing scene, I would really appreciate any feedback you could give me. Rachel.m.mitchell (talk) 05:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Replied there. Khazar2 (talk) 11:49, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

The Rwandan Genocide

Hello, I plan to expand the article on the Rwandan Genocide. My plan to improve the article consists of the following:

• Adding a Gacaca Court section
• Editing the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) section
• Editing the War Rape section (and renaming it as Gender Targeted Crimes Against Humanity)

Improving the Rwandan Genocide article plays an important part to this WikiProject especially since the future of the Rwandans lies on the justice system. In the year of 2012, the Gacaca Courts were closed (BBC News article) and the United Nations announced that the ICTR will close by the end of 2014 (UN Centre News article). Although the Rwandan Genocide page is detailed and has many links to related pages, I was surprised that it does not have a section for the Gacaca Court, which played a major part in the justice system after the genocide. I also did not understand why the article does not go over the closing of the Gacaca Courts and planned closing of the ICTR in detail. These decisions play a large role in the human rights of the Rwandans.

As for the "War Rape" section, there is a concern in the Talk page over the section being overwhelmed by just one source. I plan to add two scholarly articles that could provide a balance. (Article 1) (Article 2). I think collecting relevant information from the two articles will help to improve the section. Also, I think that changing the title of this section, "War Rape," to "Gender Targeted Crimes Against Humanity" would be better in explaining the subject. I feel like the title is too broad in relation to the Rwandan Genocide. The term "war rape," as the word "war" suggests, refers to such crimes during war. War and genocide are not the same, and so, I think that the title should be changed.

Overall, I plan to add the article in where I feel it lacks the most. In expanding the article, I plan to use scholarly articles to find relevant information that will contribute to my plan and overall to this WikiProject.

I would greatly appreciate feedback to further improve my plan for the Rwandan Genocide article. Please post a message to me on my Talk page. Thank you! MinjKim (talk) 09:25, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Replied at Talk:Rwandan Genocide. Khazar2 (talk) 17:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Edit of birth control sabotage article

The current Wikipedia page on birth control sabotage is insufficient in fully covering the topic of reproductive coercion. Birth control sabotage is one form of reproductive coercion, which falls under domestic violence. This article needs a more concrete explanation of what reproductive coercion is and an additional outline of the three divisions of reproductive coercion: pregnancy pressure, birth control sabotage, and pregnancy coercion. These topics all deserve recognition because it is a form of domestic violence that can be used to control another person. This means that I want to change the title of the page, its layout, and its content to better represent the idea of reproductive coercion. I plan on pulling from various scholarly journals, news articles, and women's centers (such as the | Houston Area Women's Center to create a more-encompassing page on reproductive coercion, the types, and its relationship to domestic violence. I would appreciate any type of feedback from the Wikipedia community about my proposed article expansion. Rachelpop- (talk) 16:38, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Sounds like a good outline, Rachel. Welcome to the project! Khazar2 (talk) 20:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed Revision of Illegal Immigration to the United States

Hello all. As part of a project for my sociology class I am proposing some revisions to the Deportations section of the Illegal Immigration to the United States article. I am planning on revising and expanding the entire Deportations section by including social, economic, and political aspects. For social effects in particular I plan to focus on the effects that deportations have on family members that have been left behind in the United States such as children of illegal immigrants. I have found at least one pertinent article titled The Ones They Leave Behind: Deportation of Lawful Permanent Residents Harm U.S. Citizen Children published by the Immigration Policy Center but would appreciate some help finding a few more sources to complete my research on this topic. I would love any feedback on this proposal or any resources to help me on my search for more information. Thanks!

Victoria.delgado (talk) 17:14, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Welcome, Victoria! I responded at the article talk page. Khazar2 (talk) 21:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed edits Reproductive justice

As a student in Rice University’s Poverty, Justice, and Human Capabilities class and a new member of the Wiki community, I want to introduce myself and discuss improvements I would like to make to the WikiProject Human rights article entitled Reproductive justice. Although the existing article differentiates well between reproductive health, reproductive rights, and reproductive justice, I want to emphasize the latter’s unique role in promoting the welfare of women.

I would address first the issues of the article highlighted by the Wikipedia community, namely the page’s lack of perspective or global consideration. I’d also like to expand the short article introduction and add information from international sources such as the United Nations to contribute to the balance and depth of each subsection. Finally, I want to include a subsection examining the reproductive justice movement in Latin America as a case study. More specific edits that I intend to make can be found on the article’s talk page, but I would appreciate any feedback you think might guide my aims and edits. As a new contributor, I could use all the advice you want to share with me. Thank you for your help!

Nlaza (talk) 17:42, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Welcome, Nlaza! I responded at the article's talk page. Khazar2 (talk) 21:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage ready for community feedback

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, an RFC that will affect the title of the articles currently titled Support for the legalization of abortion and Opposition to legal abortion if consensus is found in favor of its conclusions, is now in its community feedback phase and ready for editors to register opinions and arguments. Please add your feedback; thanks! —chaos5023 (talk) 17:29, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Portal:Society at peer review

Portal:Society is now up for portal peer review, the review page is at Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Society/archive1. I've put a bit of effort into this as part of a featured portal drive related to portals linked from the top-right corner of the Main Page, and feedback would be appreciated prior to featured portal candidacy. Thank you for your time, — Cirt (talk) 02:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Freedom of speech = New WikiProject

• WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech

Hi there, I'm notifying this WikiProject due to its relevance to Freedom of speech. I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:

1. List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
2. Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
3. Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
4. Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
5. Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.

Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 22:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Article improvement drive: Pussy Riot

I'm not sure how many active members WP Human rights has these days, but I thought we might steal a page from other WikiProjects and do an occasional article improvement drive, working as a team to improve one of the project's 50-100 most-viewed articles--hopefully getting it up to Good or Featured Article status. Would anyone be interested in pitching in on a project like that?

Last month Pussy Riot was our most-viewed article (beating Gandhi, believe it or not), and I'd like to propose it for our first project. As a comparatively recent phenomenon, this article is one that wouldn't require extensive library research, making it a bit more accessible. The article's also a bit of a mess--a lot of different comments and quotations from major and minor sources alike, without much organization. If you're interested in lending a hand, let me know or just join in the fun. The article could definitely use more eyes! Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

New article: Freedom for the Thought That We Hate

• Freedom for the Thought That We Hate

New article, created, at Freedom for the Thought That We Hate. Additional assistance in research would be appreciated, feel free to help out at the article's talk page. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 08:08, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

CfD: Category:Political prisoners and detainees in China

Editors involved in this wikiproject may be interested to know that Category:Political prisoners and detainees of China', which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Note that this discussion follows from a previous CfD on September 12th concerning other country categories for political prisoners.Homunculus (duihua) 03:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

WP Human Rights in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Human Rights for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 17:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Portal:Society for featured portal consideration

• Portal:Society

I've nominated Portal:Society for featured portal candidacy, discussion is at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Society. Thank you for your time, — Cirt (talk) 22:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Turkey

I might be wrong but at several sections the 'Human rights in Turkey' seem to be structured as PR piece, cheery picking what is said in the reports and ignoring more recent reports that pertain to the current administration. --79.181.254.141 (talk) 12:47, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm not up-to-date enough on Turkish human rights issues to judge, but you're welcome (and encouraged!) to add sourced information that you feel would give a more complete picture. Let me know if I can help--you can leave me a note here or on my talk page. Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:52, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Added open tasks

In an effort to make this page more friendly to new users, I've added some suggested open tasks. I've also cleaned up a bit of clutter that accumulated over time--five-year-old requests for help, etc. As always, feel free to revert me if it appears I've overreached. Thanks all! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:41, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

As part of this general page cleanup, I've also added an archivebot to periodically archive 90-day-old threads. With 80 threads, this page is getting unwieldy. If there are any objections, just let me know. -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:45, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

human rights movement

Hi all, I wanted to solicit some help with the article "human rights movement". Here's an ambitious new article, covering a huge topic. The article definitely ought to exist, but we really should give it some good attention so that it starts to reflect the global realities of human rights activism. It's rated as "high" importance, "start" class for the Wikiproject. Thanks, groupuscule (talk) 02:16, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

I'm up to my elbows in Eleanor Roosevelt and general cleanup at the moment (how's that for an image?) but would be glad to swing by and pitch in in a week or two. You might check out Lynn Hunt's Inventing Human Rights: A History, which covers some early conceptions of human rights. I can also put in some info on the push to create the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; I'm planning to work on that along with ER (she was a primary drafter of the document). Cheers for taking this on. -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:06, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. That's a very powerful image when you see it with fresh eyes. groupuscule (talk) 03:28, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

As an undergrad I briefly considered getting it as a tattoo. =) -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Human rights coming up in The Signpost

• Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-12-10/WikiProject report

WP:WikiProject Human rights will be discussed in The Signpost coming up, see link above for an advance look. :) — Cirt (talk) 02:19, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Good to see, thanks! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Organ Trade

Hello everybody, I am another student at Rice working on a Wikipedia article for class. I am proposing to edit the "Organ Trade" article to be more inclusive of the growing amount of information available about how the illegal organ trade impacts those in impoverished nations. The current article is listed under the Medicine Wikiproject, and I believe that is inappropriate considering the "Organ Transplantation" article covers all medical and historical aspects of organ donating. I believe the article should be added to the Human Rights Wikiproject because this issue disproportionately affects citizens of nations with that have been recognized as lacking appropriate capabilities. The current Organ Trade article is small and only has a few qualitative examples of how the illegal organ trade has expanded. In my research I have found several scholarly sources that I intend to use to help Wikipedia be more informative on this issue. I will also update the section on scholarly debate and fix the dead links that are at the bottom of the page. I would greatly appreciate any help that you all could give and I look forward to working with everyone in the coming months.

CoeA (talk) 01:41, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi CoeA, welcome to the project, and thanks for your editing. I would suggest leaving the medicine WikiProject banner on the organ trade article, but you can always add the human rights banner also if it seems appropriate. It's fine for an article to belong to more than one project. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 01:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

I will be working with CoeA in the Organ trade expansion for the class project. In addition to the arguments represented above by CoeA, I believe that this article should be added to the Human Rights WikiProject because it deals with the controversial issue of bodily dignity. From my research, I have gathered that a point of debate amongst scholars remains the role of government in dictating what decisions individuals can make with their body - should citizens be allowed to decide if they want to sell their organs? Is it the government's place to make this decision for them? This issue is compounded by the fact that the majority of individuals willing to sell their organs are living in poverty. As mentioned above, we are hoping to expand the article with current statistics and instances of organ trafficking along with scholarly debate over the issues surrounding the issue. Any further thoughts or suggestions would much appreciated!

Welcome! Sounds like a good expansion, but I'd be wary of expanding the "Debate" section too much; I'd argue that the majority of the article should stay details about the organ trade itself. One possibility would be to WP:SPINOFF the debate into a new article called "Ethics of organ trading" or some similar title. Khazar2 (talk) 11:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Daniellam91 (talk) 09:03, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Not that there's also a page on Organ harvesting. It was recently greatly reduced to exclude any specific incidents or allegations, but good to keep in mind. I'd be happy to help on this if you feel you could use another set of eyes.—Zujine|talk 00:35, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Peer Review Request

Peer review has been requested and reviews will be appreciated for the article Globalization. Meclee (talk) 14:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

I can take a look and leave a few comments. Thanks for your work on this. -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Malala Yousafzai

I am new here and have never done any work on wikipedia to increase the rating of articles. I am also not a writer.

I see that one of the goals of this project is to:

increase the number of well-written human rights related articles by expanding all stubs to start-class and improving all start-class articles to B-class at least

I am particularly interesred in Malala Yousafzai which this project has rated B-class – how would one go about increasing this rating? Just wondering. Ottawahitech (talk) 01:33, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi Ottawa, the next step for this one would be to increase the rating to Good Article status. That will take a detailed review from an uninvolved editor at the GA nominations page. Check out the Good article criteria first to see if the article meets these. It looks like a well-written and sourced article at first glance, so it should be close. Whether or not it can pass without an image (criterion 6) may be up to an individual reviewer. But even if no images of MY herself are available, maybe somebody's posted a free image of one of the rallies for her to Flickr, or an NGO would donate one?

Hope this helps! Feel free to ping me here or at my talk page if there's anyway I can help out in the future with this. -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks Khazar2 for the super-speedy response. The topic of Good Article has apparently already been discussed on the talkpage of the article some time ago, and I am not sure how many editors are still working on it. I will check the info you provided and see what can be done. Thanks again. Ottawahitech (talk) 02:06, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

• Thank you for your work on this one! Like everyone else in the world, I've been following that case off and on, and it'd be great to have a top-quality article on it. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

MLK to good article?

With Martin Luther King Day around the corner in the US, I'm making a push to bring his article up to Good Article status. Anybody who would like to help out is welcome. -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Should war crimes be hidden from the campaignbox templates?

There is a discussion started at Template_talk:Campaignbox_Northern_Mali_conflict_(2012–present)#War_crimes_don.27t_happen_during_war.3F which is a wider issue than just for the Mali conflict. Human rights violations in general tend to correlate with "battles in a campaign, theatre (warfare) or war", but those that are considered serious enough to be covered by the ICC definitions of war crimes and other systematic patterns of human rights violations are directly related to "battles in a campaign, theatre or war" in the sense that they are the illegal part of those "battles".

So the encyclopedic question is: should HR violations at the war crime level (ICC definitions) be included in the template:campaign boxes or not? We could argue that the massive HR violations should have their own box, but in general these get less media coverage and less WP-article attention. Does a military conflict consist just of "heroic, glorious battles" or does it often still include ICC-type crimes/HR violations? IMHO the ICC-applicable HR violations, i.e. suspected war crimes and similar, should be includable in the campaignboxes. Pretending that "war is clean" would be contradicting reliable sources, but that's what the present definition of these campaign boxes seems to claim. Arguments specific to the Mali case can go to Template_talk:Campaignbox_Northern_Mali_conflict_(2012–present)#War_crimes_don.27t_happen_during_war.3F. General discussion makes more sense here. Boud (talk) 23:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Crime of aggression - debates summary?

Crime of aggression shows that any non-defensive invasion of another country (such as the US XXIst century invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan) will become a crime of agression, for which responsible individuals (politicians, military leaders) will (sometime in 2017 or later) be prosecutable by the ICC (if at least 26 more states ratify, and if the Assembly of State Parties votes in favour by 2/3). Except that.... Article 15 bis paragraphs 4, 5, 6 and 7 make it hard to see if it could ever be applied. If Luxembourg invaded Liechtenstein (by secretly smuggling its army across Switzerland unnoticed), it would still not be subject to ICC jurisdiction unless the UNSC agreed or by waiting for 6 months for the UNSC to do nothing. If Iran and the US both ratified, a US overt war on Iran would not be subject to ICC jurisdiction for 6 months if the UNSC chose to... do nothing, and if only Iran ratified, it would not at all be in ICC jurisdiction. Also, Article 16 allows the UNSC to set a renewable 12-month block against ICC investigation.

So an interesting article to create could be one summarising the debates/lobbying by "military-industrial-congressional complex"es in various States to insert these loophole clauses and to discourage the more aggressive States from ratifying. Some of this material should be online. This sounds like an important part of encyclopedic knowledge IMHO - better specific sourced knowledge rather than just speculation based on general patterns. Boud (talk) 23:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

First of all, a point of order. What is the purpose of this discussion? I don't think this is the appropriate place to begin a discussion on the topic and that it would have been more appropriate to begin one on the article's talk page. If you want to begin a section on the drafting of the amendments on the crime of aggression to the Rome Statute, you may go ahead and do so, however I don't think that it's very remarkable that the amendment, like all treaties, is the product of compromise.

As for some factual points, I disagree with two of your assertions. 1) The amendments do not criminalize all instances of non-defensive invasions, they only criminalize "against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations". Any action authorized by the Security Council would still be lawful. 2) I disagree that the constraints on the exercise of jurisdiction over the crime are so burdensome as to be prohibitive. The chances that the Security Council would obstruct an investigation are highly unlikely as it would involve a positive action by the Council, which would require the acquiescence of all five permanent members plus a majority. Therefore the Council's blocking of jurisdiction would occur only under exceptional situations where global consensus exists for not investigating. – Zntrip 00:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

The point of the discussion: "This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Human rights and anything related to its purposes and tasks." There are not so many people active in the project, and many may not happen to look at the talk page you're referring to. A discussion could well go there - I agree. But IMHO many people here might be interested, so I don't see the problem. Relax and grab a coffee or whatever beverage you prefer :).

Regarding my "assertions" - these are informal statements on a Wikipedia talk page for the WikiProject Human rights explaining my motivation for why I think an article would be interesting. They are not content for a Wikipedia article itself. If your comments above are RS'd by a WP-notable person, then they could go into the article as a sourced prediction (opinion). Your opinion that the UNSC would most likely only use its 6-month no-action block and not its 12-month active block is an interesting judgment - thanks. Boud (talk) 22:13, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

FWIW, I'd agree broadly that a section or article covering discussion/support/critique of these amendments could be interesting, depending on the number of reliable sources that could be found on the topic. -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

FAR notice

I have nominated League of Nations for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

Adding date so that this will autoarchive someday. -- Khazar2 (talk) 05:47, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Mothers' rights movement Move

A discussion of a move of Mothers' rights to Mothers' rights movement has been opened here--Cailil ^talk

Adding date so that this will autoarchive someday. -- Khazar2 (talk) 05:47, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

good Good Article news and Mandela collaboration

Some good news: a number of the 50 most popular articles of our project were promoted to Good Article status in the past month: Martin Luther King, Jr., Pussy Riot, Eleanor Roosevelt, and today, circumcision (big thanks are due to User:Zad68 for that one).

In upcoming projects, User:Midnightblueowl is working to revise Nelson Mandela, currently our third most popular article (and in need of the work!). The more the merrier there if anybody's interested. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 18:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Unaccompanied asylum seeking children

Hello! I am in the process of creating a new Wikipedia page focusing on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children, also known as separated children or unaccompanied refugee minors. I chose to join this WikiProject because it is one of the projects monitoring the Refugee page here on Wikipedia as well.

As unrest continues in much of the world, more refugees are attempting to leave their countries of origin for a safer existence elsewhere. Despite their clear need, unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UASC) are becoming a more politically contentious issue. Particularly within the last few years, the economic recession has led to a wider xenophobia and dislike of immigrants through much of the developed world. This unfortunately extends to asylum seekers in many OECD countries, especially within the European Union. Asylum seekers are characterized as free-riders who do not actually need asylum, and are simply attempting to exploit OECD countries’ resources. A Wikipedia page on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children could have a positive impact on many people’s understanding of who exactly is seeking asylum in many of these countries. UASC in particular receive comparatively little media attention despite their need for greater care, so a page devoted to them specifically is a needed source of information for people in many countries.

A Wikipedia page in particular is important in addressing the issue of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children. Most information that is readily available online comes from nonprofits who work with these children. Though this is clearly an important and frequently valid source of information, asylum detractors are unlikely to see these nonprofits as providing truthful information surrounding separated children. However, a Wikipedia page might be seen as an unbiased source and could work to educate even people who are against asylum on the unaccompanied asylum-seeking children within their countries.

I considered whether it would be better to add this page as a section of “asylum seeker” but ultimately decided that a UASC Wikipedia entry needed to stand on its own. I do think that a page devoted entirely to UASC is necessary in and of itself, since in general separated children are classified separately from asylum seekers, due to their being cared for by their host country’s social services. They receive far different treatment than other asylum seekers and refugees, and therefore have a vastly different experience of the refugee process. Furthermore, asylum is such a contentious political issue that I think that adding a section on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children to the asylum seeker page would be seen as a political act more than an encyclopedic one by some of the page’s users. Though I will certainly link to the page, I think that the issues surrounding separated children are distinct enough that UASC really need an entire separate entry in order to fully explore the issues.

I appreciate any insight into this issue that is available! Thank you for your consideration and for your help.

Allisonraven (talk) 19:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Article edits to Sexual violence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Hi all! I am in a Wikipedia contribution class on Poverty, Gender, and Human Development at Rice University and I want to expand upon the Sexual violence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo article. I am very passionate about this topic and I want to add onto this article because I think it will be beneficial to provide more information to give the page depth and complexity. The existing page focuses on only one narrative of "rape against women in war" and I want to add more information to reveal the issue of sexual violence at large in the country. Other forms, including high rates of domestic violence, civilian rapes, and violence targeted at men, are also prevalent and deserve attention. Moreover, the page is out of date; information of the current situation must be added as well as the country's history of sexual violence and human rights abuses.

I came to this page because the article is very relevant to this Project and I hope to provide a more realistic portrayal of the situation in the DRC. The DRC, particularly the mineral-rich and conflict-ridden eastern region, is known as the rape capital of the world; thus, this is of interest to human rights. The prevalence of sexual violence is a crime against humanity and must be understood and paid adequate attention to. Please let me know if anyone would like to give me any feedback or advice!

Juliabarrow3 (talk) 02:06, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Juliabarrow3

Revision of Gender apartheid

Hello all! As a participant in the Wikipedia Education Program, I plan on revising the page for “gender apartheid.” Because WikiProject Human Rights concerns work on inalienable and fundamental rights, I feel it is pertinent to include the article “gender apartheid” within its scope. Gender apartheid refers to the social and economic subordination of women, a phenomenon clearly distinguished from sex segregation in that a relationship of dominance exists (not only separation). With that in mind, gender apartheid is certainly relevant to WikiProject Human Rights, considering it describes the ongoing violation of female rights, e.g. through practices like wife beating. The article’s talk page shows discrepancies and confusion over the topic, which is perhaps why it was nominated for deletion and subsequently deleted a few years ago. Since then, it has been restored, albeit remaining somewhat contentious of an article.

As it stands now, the article for “gender apartheid” is inadequate for conveying to readers detail about the topic. It is sparse in content and lacking in depth, scratching only the surface of a much more complex issue. With that in mind, improvement to the article is necessary to provide readers a greater understanding of gender apartheid’s distinction from sex segregation. Knowledge of this phenomenon is crucial to understanding yet another ongoing manifestation of gender inequality, one that prevails worldwide. With that in mind, my intended changes to the page are as follows: better defining the subject; improving content depth; including more academic references; and generally cleaning up the article according to Wikipedia’s guidelines. Further details are available on the article’s talk page. All constructive feedback and ideas for revision are appreciated. Thanks in advance!

-JoyceChou (talk) 05:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Creation of New Entry: Gender Disparities in Health

Hi everyone, I am part of a Wikipedia contribution class on Poverty, Gender, and Human Development at Rice University. I am thinking of creating a new entry titled: Gender Disparities in Health. The reason why I chose to join this WikiProject page is because I regard both Gender Equality and access to health care as human rights. Unfortunately, while gender equality has made much progress in areas like education and labor force participation, health inequality between men and women continues to plague many societies today.

Gender disparities in health have been well-documented. This is particularly true in certain developing patriarchal regions, such as South Asia. Scientific and medical research have shown that females tend to have better survival rates than males when given the same amount of nutrition and access to health care. However women tend to do poorer for many health outcomes in comparison to men in many developing nations. In 2008, the World Health Organization published a report showing that of the 15 countries with the highest adult mortality risk for women, 14 came from Africa and 1 from South Asia. With regards to female child mortality, most countries were from Africa and the Middle East. These trends have been attributed to many gender-discriminating factors, which in the long run would result in women experiencing poorer health outcomes. Apart from negatively affecting the lives and health of women, gender disparities in healthcare can also have undesirable implications on a nation’s development and progress. Health has a huge influence in shaping people’s lives; how we decide to manage people’s health often determines their level of social productivity. Considering that women contribute a great deal to society, the persistence of gender disparities in health can translate to large social and economic costs for nations.

Presently, despite the extensive discourse on and broad implications of gender disparities in health, there is no proper article or entry on the topic in Wikipedia. Moreover, information on the topic is not only sparse, but also inaccurate. Currently, the few discussions on gender disparities in health are restricted to a small subsection titled “Healthcare equity and sex” under the “Health Equity” page. However, even in this small section, there is absolutely no discussion of the health discrimination issues that women face. The content of the subsection focuses primarily on why men are disadvantaged in terms of receiving health care. Additionally, under another subsection which lists the factors that contribute to disparities in access to health care, there is no mention of gender. All in all, there is very limited discussion on gender disparities in health care within Wikipedia.

For this new entry, I plan to provide some background information on health inequality and how gender serves as an axis of differentiation that works against women. After this I plan to provide some examples and statistics of gender disparities that are currently in existence around the world. I also intend to include a section that describes some of the factors that result in gender disparities in health, like sex-selective abortion and preferential care. Following that, I will proceed to highlight the impacts and implications of having gender disparities, both socially and economically. Finally, I will list some of the countermeasures recommended by academics to address this issue, as well as some of the policies implemented that have led to a reduction of gender disparities in health. The entry will end with a ‘See Also’ section, where I will put up links of pages which relevant to the topics discussed. Some of the sources I plan to draw from and cite include World Development Reports and academic references, such as peer reviewed articles from various public health journals.

One of the concerns I have for this project is the topic being too broad/extensive for the amount of time I have in writing this article. Hence I am thinking of narrowing down my focus to discuss gender disparities in health within just one particular region. Based on the feedback I have received, I am thinking of South Asia but I am open to other recommendations for locales. I also really appreciate any feedback or comments on both my ideas and plans for writing this new entry. If you are interested in learning more, do chat me up for a more detailed description of the outline I have for this new entry! Thanks!

Benongyx (talk • contribs) 10:18, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

The addition of the Acid throwing article

Hello everyone, I am a Rice University student working on the Acid throwing article as part of a class assignment. I was hoping to add this article the Human Rights WikiProject as the highly negative impact that such a crime has – the disfiguration, humiliation, and psychological consequences – clearly violates the basic human rights entitled to individual. Moreover, the act of acid throwing occurs discriminately against women, especially those living in poverty. Such attacks can be classified as honor attacks, as many occur against women who are deemed as dishonorable for dressing immodestly or being promiscuous, and the attackers rarely face repercussions for their actions. The article is currently limited in scope, but I hope to expand upon the sociological and cultural factors that propagate these attacks, present ways to combat this phenomenon, and offer a more global perspective. I have already found sources that detail the scope of attacks in areas such as Uganda, Iran, and South America, along with articles that offer possible solutions for combating acid throwing. Please let me know your thoughts on this topic, as well as any suggestions for the revisions I plan to make - I look forward to working with everyone! Thank you so much. Daniellam91 (talk) 18:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Rice University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q4 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)