User talk:HandThatFeeds

This is HandThatFeeds's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024: 14 days

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

HandThatFeeds is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

You might want to see this

[1] Which was about this. Doug Weller talk 12:33, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Man, this person is trying to speed-run getting banned so they can claim it's all a conspiracy. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 15:33, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Doug Weller talk 17:04, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pentagon UFO videos

Hey mate, I see you undid my edit because it didn't read as encyclopedic, which I agree with. As I mentioned on the talk page, I'm struggling with the wording. Is there any way you could help me out with this one to make it sound better? And to address WP:SYN, the paragraph is entirely cited by the first reference, so it was not synthesis on my part. The other three references were simply to provide additional verification. Thank you in advance for your help. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 21:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey mate, still haven't heard back, so I restored the content. Hoping you can eventually help with rewording! Enix150 (talk) 07:48, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been busy this last week, so I didn't have time to dedicate to this. At the moment, I've removed it from the article again, and will bring it up on the Talk page. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 13:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jan 23. 2023.

I never claimed the rules agree with me, this whole time I have asked others to point out a specific rule I may have overlooked or not known about. You entered into the talk page discussion later, misinterpreted my intentions multiple times (I wanted to describe antifa as “left to far left” not just as “far left”) have not given me a valid reason beyond your own personal opinion as to why all my sources aren’t allowed, then you quoted the consensus at me and when I pointed out that consensus is not simply a popular vote, you accused me of wikilawyering. You also mentioned multiple times that you have been an editor here longer to me in what I now assume to be some sort of way to intimidate a newer/less experienced editor. Good faith is indeed running out and I will seek arbitration if you continue to treat me like this. Digital Herodotus (talk) 18:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your record of showing a lack of good faith and personal attacks is likely to get you blocked. Doug Weller talk 18:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If by "arbitration" you mean WP:ARBCOM, you're barking up the wrong tree. They won't touch a simple dispute like this. And if you drag this over to WP:ANI, I expect you'll be excoriated. This isn't going to go the way you want. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 18:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have attempted to engage with you in a civil manner and in good faith, I’ve asked to to stop treating me this way, and now I will request assistance in dealing with your behavior towards me. Digital Herodotus (talk) 18:42, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]