User talk:Jbat98

Welcome!

Hello, Jbat98, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -zappa.jak e (talk) 06:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Laude Hartrum

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Laude Hartrum, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Laude Hartrum is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Laude Hartrum, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Laude Hartrum

The Laude Hartrum article has been speedily deleted. This has been done because the article does not indicate how or why the person is significant (along with providing reputable sources), to the extent that they meet our criteria for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's significance may be deleted at any time. Please see our notability guidelines for our inclusion criteria for musicians. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you disagree with the deletion (with evidence of the subject's significance, per our inclusion criteria, along with several reliable sources), you may request deletion review. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Aude (talk) 06:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jbat98! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Bernie Schroeder - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rick McCarty

The article Rick McCarty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not asserted. Unsourced biography of a living person (BLP).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kubanczyk (talk) 23:26, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:RodgerBeckman.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RodgerBeckman.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rodger Beckman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rodger Beckman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodger Beckman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 14:37, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ed Brady 1993 Tampa Bay Buccaneers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ed Brady 1993 Tampa Bay Buccaneers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lake Michigan Broadcasting

The article Lake Michigan Broadcasting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No refs, years out of date, and does not meet criteria for company inclusions

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]