User talk:Noturbusiness98

Edit-warring, deleting sourced content

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noturbusiness98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The Billboard article itself contains rumors, i do not understand the reason why i am blocked when the article itself contains a fight between 2 people and rumors that are not proven, it goes aganist the Wikipedia guidelines, the rumors are not sourcable infos to use in a factual page

Decline reason:

If you don't understand why you are blocked, then you definitely shouldn't be unblocked. Your POV edits at Ice Cream (Blackpink and Selena Gomez song) and your (now deleted) user page are unacceptable on this project, which you seem to have mistaken for some kind of K-POP message board battleground instead of an encyclopedia. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:02, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Proof (album), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:22, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The edits made to Proof(album) are constructive and relative to real informations given by the artists own agency.

Ref

https://www.rollingstone.co.uk/music/news/bts-reveal-details-upcoming-anthology-album-proof-16159/

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/bts-releasing-new-album-we-are-bulletproof

https://www.clashmusic.com/news/bts-confirm-anthology-album-proof Noturbusiness98 (talk) 12:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Proof (album). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:28, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Proof (album), you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again the edits given are not diruptive and follow the truth given by the own group's agency. I already went in your talk page but you don't really seem to accept it Noturbusiness98 (talk) 12:39, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]