User talk:Aervanath/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Hey all! Feel free to leave messages for me here.

U.S. President

Your editing of the sentence regarding the number of presidents makes it much easier to understand. you aussies are alllll right. except this guy. haha, what an ass. -Taco325i 15:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Hooray for Marylanders

Yes, I am a Marylander, I hail from Howard County. howzabout you? -Taco325i 03:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Out of state, at Drexel. i should have stayed in state. -Taco325i 03:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

U Made Bad Choice? I also made a bad choice, but U Saved Big Money. -Taco325i 03:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

speedy on methoxypropane

I have added a hangon to methoxypropane. The article has an importance tag, and an expert tag, people are working on this backlog. Part of the discussion can be found in the wikiproject notability, and on wikiproject chemicals. Hope this explains. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Auschwitz

Hi. To answer your question; because previous requests under this policy have been declined.--Anthony.bradbury 21:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

My username

I think I need to be part of a FAQ :-) See this Kuro5hin article. - Ta bu shi da yu 22:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm afraid that my username is a bit misleading. I can say about 3 or 4 phrases in Mandarin (one of them very rude!), but I never got far with study. As I'm now married into a Lebanese family, I'm going to learn Arabic next :-) Maybe one day I'll come back to it! - Ta bu shi da yu 03:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Tone of responses

Hi there. Excuse me for being blunt, but your 2 responses to lumberjack here seem a mite churlish. My philosophy is, if you're going to answer a question anyway, there's nothing to be gained by doing so in what might be interpreted as a mean-spirited manner that could well have the effect of turning people away from this fabulous resource. Not everyone is as skilled at searching for information as others are. I note you've been a Wikipedian for only 3 months or so. I've been on this site since December 2003 and I have almost 11,000 edits to my name, but it wasn't immediately clear to me where to go to find the information lumberjack was after. All the very best. JackofOz 04:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Talk: President of the United States

Regarding your responses to a user who posed a question under section entitled: "Presidential term":

I am sure your responses to this user were with good intentions, but this seems like a harsh attitude to take for a legitimate question. If you don't like to look up things for people, simply don't. The question was not posed TO YOU. If somebody doesn't know how to, have the time to, or want to look it up themselves, why can't they just post the question on a talk page? There are plenty of other editors who would be more than happy to answer such a question.

Looking at your user page I notice you chose to put the trifecta userbox on it, which includes a link to " Don't be a dick" essay. I am not accusing you of anything, but when I read that essay, It reminds me not to be unnecessarily terse or blunt to other users. You may find it does the same for you. Jerry lavoie 18:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Whelan's Infraction

The intention of the wiki, Whelan's Infraction, was to educate. As a medical student, my knowledge base grows daily with pathologies that are very real and some which are extremely rare. In the case of the condition known as Whelan’s Infraction, there is no such disease. Those that are not privy to accessing the Annals of Neurology may find what I wrote to be of great use. However, we medical students have very little time to monitor our posts and continue to nourish them with constant updates to every suggestion. To this, I am sure that many of the users of Wikipedia would reply, “Then don’t post!” I believe that the sharing of information is the last individual commodity, we have, in this globalized world. Aervanath, you make yourself unavailable to email, which I do not disagree, is a good thing. However, rather than removing the myriad of posts, which you deem incomplete or inappropriate, write some of your own. In this I am quoting an old adage; It is much easier to be a critic than a painter. My intentions were noble -- you are acting as dictator of what is acceptable, which in itself is not.Coagulase 23:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Deletion Copy :)

I got a speedy deletion for a page called "Martin Tišajev", could I get a copy of that. I worked really hard on that and I wouldn't wanna see it go waste :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by IamNyan (talk • contribs) 00:21, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

New MOS:CAPS discussion

The topic of an inconclusive discussion that you participated in (Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 8#Apparent conflict of guidelines) has been brought up again at WT:MOSCAPS#Contradiction and divergence at MOS:MUSIC. You may (or may not) want to express an opinion at the new discussion. Deor (talk) 17:33, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- --JamboQueen (talk) 17:00, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 15:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

The weather in London listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The weather in London. Since you had some involvement with the The weather in London redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Isaac Oscar (talk) 14:12, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Côte d'Ivoire and Ivory Coast

16File:Lingchi(cropped).jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by LALALT (talk • contribs) 12:52, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Aervanath, thanks for closing the RM at WikiProject Côte d'Ivoire / WikiProject Ivory Coast. First, I wanted to make sure you intended to mark the discussion on the talk page as closed. I'm happy to do that for you if you'd like. Second, I was hoping you could edit {{WikiProject Africa}} to reflect the name change; if you'd prefer I make an edit request on its talk page, I can do that too. Thanks, BDD (talk) 20:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:15, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 17:30, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)