User talk:Ottomachin

Welcome

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ottomachin. I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! JoeSperrazza (talk) 14:04, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

File copyright problem with File:Nohands.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Nohands.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Nohands.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nohands.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Nohands.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nohands.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:COUNTER battery fire.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:COUNTER battery fire.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors, as you did on Bacon and egg pie. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Edit stummaries such as the following are uncivil and considered a personal attack. Please discuss content on the article's talk page, and do not attack any editors in any venue. JoeSperrazza (talk) 14:04, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Unified Modeling Language. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I don't think this is worth being blocked over. Let the bully finish his tirade and then we can clean things up afterwards. The CN won't hurt the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Unified Modeling Language. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:27, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muldoon quote

I am unable to find any reference to this quote, and it seems unlikely that such a damning admission would be overlooked. I have viewed contemporary television coverage of the 1984 snap election coverage and read the relevant chapter of "His way" by Gustafson. I did find a similar quote at http://www.racecafe.co.nz/forum/printthread.php?t=33069&page=2&pp=10

'as outgoing Minister of Finance when the Kirk govt came to power "They can't deliver on the election promises they made because there's no money, I've spent it all hahaha"'

but that is not a reliable source being a forum, and the quote does not appear in Gustafson. If you could give a more accurate date and context, that might assist in tracking this down.-gadfium 00:31, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are a newish editor (going by your edit count, at least). You ask whether eye witness accounts are disallowed these days. Well, one of the core Wikipedia policies is verifiability. Have a read and that will answer your question. If you would like to discuss this further, drop me a talkback note on my talk page - happy to help. And don't be frustrated by this. Schwede 66 08:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's a difference between 1972 and 1984, and a difference between your recollection of what was said and the quote as given on the forum. We need a reliable source for the quote, and your eyewitness recollection is not sufficient.-gadfium 19:32, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the references on my talk page. The first reference, [1] is very suitable but doesn't actually name the person who made the statement. However, put together with Brian Easton's column at [2] it is clear this is Muldoon. The other two references are to forums, and thus not suitable.

You will realise that this process has been valuable as the quote does come from 1972 (or thereabouts), and not 1984 as you had thought.

Which is the most suitable article to place the quote in? I think that one of Second National Government of New Zealand#Defeat, New Zealand general election, 1972#result, or Robert Muldoon#Leader of the Opposition would be appropriate. New Zealand National Party has a broader scope, and the quote is less relevant there, especially in context of the Easton column you linked to, which does point out this this is "a generalisation about every election year".

I will be happy to place the quote once we have agreed on a suitable place for it.-gadfium 20:55, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have put the quote in the Robert Muldoon article, and also started an article at Wikiquote. You are most welcome to expand Wikiquote with other snippets.-gadfium 21:30, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ISO 25964-1 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ISO 25964-1 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISO 25964-1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Roshan220195 (talk) 21:43, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]