Jump to content

User talk:70.161.173.99: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
<!-- Template:uw-aoablock -->
<!-- Template:uw-aoablock -->
:Since you continue to insist that Rjensen is lying in edit summaries, you're blocked. You were warned about personalizing disputes. Please stop making such accusations, it is not acceptable.. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></font>''' 11:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
:Since you continue to insist that Rjensen is lying in edit summaries, you're blocked. You were warned about personalizing disputes. Please stop making such accusations, it is not acceptable.. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></font>''' 11:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
::Okay, so just to clarify, you're saying that if I see someone leaving an edit description that does not reflect the actual edit, I'm not allowed to report it? Am I going about this the wrong way? What can I do if someone is leaving deceptive edit descriptions? [[Special:Contributions/70.161.173.99|70.161.173.99]] ([[User talk:70.161.173.99#top|talk]]) 16:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:13, 14 June 2016

June 2016

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 03:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please link to where I attacked other editors, so that I may learn from the experience.70.161.173.99 (talk) 04:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Acroterion (talk) 03:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Making personal attacks on other editors on an administrative noticeboard is a poor idea. Please stop making claims of bad faith. You will be blocked (both IP and account) if you do not change your approach to interactions with other editors. Acroterion (talk) 03:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what you mean by claims of bad faith. Is this a good example of such a claim of bad faith? "you are making up the neocon claim to attack a Democratic nominee for president during an election campaign because you oppose her politics."70.161.173.99 (talk) 04:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what I did that was a personal attack. He was leaving edit descriptions that didn't reflect his edits, so I said he was lying about his edits. I don't understand what I did wrong here.70.161.173.99 (talk) 04:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 11:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
Since you continue to insist that Rjensen is lying in edit summaries, you're blocked. You were warned about personalizing disputes. Please stop making such accusations, it is not acceptable.. Acroterion (talk) 11:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, so just to clarify, you're saying that if I see someone leaving an edit description that does not reflect the actual edit, I'm not allowed to report it? Am I going about this the wrong way? What can I do if someone is leaving deceptive edit descriptions? 70.161.173.99 (talk) 16:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]