Talk:T-26: Difference between revisions
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
:No problem, but bolding is necessary sometimes to highlight key phrases supporting the correct and reliable information, for instance. Regards, --[[User:Vladimir Historian|Vladimir Historian]] ([[User talk:Vladimir Historian|talk]]) 21:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC) |
:No problem, but bolding is necessary sometimes to highlight key phrases supporting the correct and reliable information, for instance. Regards, --[[User:Vladimir Historian|Vladimir Historian]] ([[User talk:Vladimir Historian|talk]]) 21:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
:: Such needs are exceedingly rare; most folks who can edit Wikipedia can also read. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 14:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
:: Such needs are exceedingly rare; most folks who can edit Wikipedia can also read. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 14:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
Not exceedingly rare as they are mentioned in [[WP:SHOUT]] ;) Anyway, to highlight important information (but not all text, of course, with this point I agree) '''bolding''' is sometimes necessary, this is obvious. This section can be removed even as everything with bolding is clear and the further work with the article text is going well. Regards, --[[User:Vladimir Historian|Vladimir Historian]] ([[User talk:Vladimir Historian|talk]]) 15:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC) |
Not exceedingly rare as they are mentioned in [[WP:SHOUT]] ;) Anyway, to highlight important information (but not all text, of course, with this point I agree) '''bolding''' is sometimes necessary, this is obvious. This section can be removed even as everything with bolding is clear (I have removed bolding in archive notes) and the further work with the article text is going well. Regards, --[[User:Vladimir Historian|Vladimir Historian]] ([[User talk:Vladimir Historian|talk]]) 15:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:52, 21 January 2014
This article is undergoing a featured article review. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's very best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria.
Please feel free to If the article has been moved from its initial review period to the Featured Article Removal Candidate (FARC) section, you may support or contest its removal. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the T-26 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 45 days |
T-26 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 30, 2013. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Kilomiets vs Kolomiets
Noticed these two names in references section. Two different persons or the same person with his name written wrong in one case? Kyng (talk) 11:45, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- This is a misprint. Of course, the person is the same - Russian tank historian Maxim Kolomiets. I've corrected this in the main text already Vladimir Historian (talk) 07:38, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
FAR needed
This article has large swaths of uncited text (to name only one of the problems) and needs to be submitted to WP:FAR (allowing the necessary number of days after TFA). Most of the uncited text was not present in the promoted version, so a good deal of the content in this article now was not vetted at WP:FAC. It is unlikely this amount of new material can be brought to standard easily, so I will initiate a FAR next week unless there are some dramatic changes in here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Certainly. I'm actually surprised that it was able to make TFA with so many obvious issues. Better sourced and written articles have been demoted on lesser concerns, yet this somehow made the main page. TFA needs to evaluate this case to prevent it from repeating itself. - Caribbean~H.Q. 07:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Excessive markup
Vladimir Historian please review WP:SHOUT and avoid filling the talk page with excessive markup like bolding. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- No problem, but bolding is necessary sometimes to highlight key phrases supporting the correct and reliable information, for instance. Regards, --Vladimir Historian (talk) 21:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
- Such needs are exceedingly rare; most folks who can edit Wikipedia can also read. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Not exceedingly rare as they are mentioned in WP:SHOUT ;) Anyway, to highlight important information (but not all text, of course, with this point I agree) bolding is sometimes necessary, this is obvious. This section can be removed even as everything with bolding is clear (I have removed bolding in archive notes) and the further work with the article text is going well. Regards, --Vladimir Historian (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured article review candidates
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- FA-Class Russia articles
- Mid-importance Russia articles
- Mid-importance FA-Class Russia articles
- FA-Class Russia (technology and engineering) articles
- Technology and engineering in Russia task force articles
- FA-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- FA-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- FA-Class military history articles
- FA-Class military land vehicles articles
- Military land vehicles task force articles
- FA-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- FA-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- FA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- FA-Class Spanish military history articles
- Spanish military history task force articles
- FA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Successful requests for military history A-Class review
- FA-Class Soviet Union articles
- Mid-importance Soviet Union articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles
- FA-Class Finland articles
- Mid-importance Finland articles
- All WikiProject Finland pages
- FA-Class Spain articles
- Mid-importance Spain articles
- All WikiProject Spain pages