Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:07, 1 April 2011

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ArticleEs for deletion is not notable enough to determine other articles' notability. Unless someone can find a CNN article about this subject then it should die in a fire immediately. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 01:23, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete Not notable ... has anyone ever written a book about AfD, ever?? It seems this page is mostly just a collection of links. Also this is my third spoof AfD of the day and if there are any more people might start to wonder if they can take me seriously when I try to vote in a real AfD. So let's just solve the problem by getting rid of AfD altogether. —Soap— 02:25, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete CSD and PROD are sufficient. It will definitely cut down the amount of drama if there is no AfD. In addition AfD is by no means notable, so lets delete all other AfD debates as well as they are equally non-notable, then salt. If we really need a AfD page, why not use this page. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 02:28, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:HOAX. Clearly doesn't exist, no sources found whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:28, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This page isn't notable and yet we're relying on it for the AFDs of other pages. This must be stopped! Bejinhan talks 02:38, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -Waste of memory and badwidth space, better off used in storing important stuff. --TitanOne (talk) 02:49, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep This page has potential, but it could use some improvements. Suggest total rewrite. --Nick Penguin_(contribs) 02:56, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete completely unencyclopedic, even a full rewrite wouldn't help. Violates WP:NOT in several levels. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:09, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - What's the point of a page that destroys Wikipedia articles :P Dough 48 72 03:24, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I found a couple reliable sources [1][2] that might be able to help. Magicperson _{(Politically correct)} 03:33, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to WP:Votes for Deletion, Voting is Good. ;-P 65.93.12.101 (talk) 03:34, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Speedy Suppa Duppa Delete - This article is clearly a BLATANT infringement to every single rule in Wikipedia! And this place is filthy! Let's clean it up.
This post brought to you by Dial Soap
Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 03:48, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Right, stop that, it's silly ~ ~~ 65.93.12.101 (talk) 65.93.12.101 (talk) 03:52, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 03:52, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 03:52, 1 April 2011 (UTC)~[reply]
A rabbit wearing a top hat with a walrus on a bicycle Will explain if necessary Purple backpack89 04:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Other stuff exists that isn't even as notable as this! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:23, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But does it pass the Pokemon test? Purple backpack89 04:28, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to collect them all, why do I gotta? 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)~~ 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)~~ 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)65.93.12.101 (talk) 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)~ 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)~~[reply]

Delete with seasoning on top. Absolutely useless. Umbralcorax (talk) 05:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 *'''Keep'''. [[WP:CFD|Other]] [[WP:RFD|stuff]] [[WP:TFD|exists]] that isn't even as notable as this! -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|<font color="red">&hearts;</font>]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|<font color="red">&diams;</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|<font color="black">&clubs;</font>]] &spades; 04:23, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 ::But does it pass the Pokemon test? '''<font face="Verdana">[[User:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#3A003A">Pur</font><font color="#800080">ple</font>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#991C99">back</font><font color="#CC33CC">pack</font><font color="gold">89</font>]]</font>'''  04:28, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
+:::I don't want to collect them all, why do I gotta? 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)~~ 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)~~ 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[[Special:Contributions/65.93.12.101|65.93.12.101]] ([[User talk:65.93.12.101|talk]]) 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC) 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)~ 05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)05:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)~~
 *'''Delete''' with [[WP:SALT|seasoning]] on top. Absolutely useless. [[User:Umbralcorax|Umbralcorax]] ([[User talk:Umbralcorax|talk]]) 05:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)