User talk:Appellative: Difference between revisions
You've uploaded an image with no license information |
→ISBNs for Bonchurch: new section |
||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. Thank you for your cooperation. --[[User:ImageTaggingBot|ImageTaggingBot]] ([[User talk:ImageTaggingBot|talk]]) 01:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC) |
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. Thank you for your cooperation. --[[User:ImageTaggingBot|ImageTaggingBot]] ([[User talk:ImageTaggingBot|talk]]) 01:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
== ISBNs for [[Bonchurch]] == |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
Is it still necessary to include the ISBNs for the books in the references section? |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
No, I don't think so. To be honest, I think the template was unnecessary in the first place if the 'Sources' section gave ISBNs at the time it was tagged. [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#cite-note_3]] is a good example of this in use on an official guideline page. Sorry to bother you - I'm deleting the message now... --[[User:Peeky44|Peeky44]] ([[User talk:Peeky44|talk]]) 00:58, 22 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:58, 22 December 2008
Welcome
|
Hi. Are you sure that A prune affair was a G1? It was coherent and sensical enough for me to understand what it was about. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC).
- No worries, we all make a few mistakes when learning =). Just remember that {{db-nonsense}} is only for totally incoherent articles, not for articles on unimportant things. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC).
Umbilicaria species
Yes, I believe so, although I didn't think about it. THanks for pointing that out. I've categorized it as such now. Sci girl (talk) 21:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Temple of Dendur - Metropolitan Museum.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Temple of Dendur - Metropolitan Museum.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
ISBNs for Bonchurch
Is it still necessary to include the ISBNs for the books in the references section?
No, I don't think so. To be honest, I think the template was unnecessary in the first place if the 'Sources' section gave ISBNs at the time it was tagged. Wikipedia:Citing sources#cite-note_3 is a good example of this in use on an official guideline page. Sorry to bother you - I'm deleting the message now... --Peeky44 (talk) 00:58, 22 December 2008 (UTC)