User talk:NaomiAmethyst

Welcome

Hello, NaomiAmethyst, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Michaelas10 (Talk) 10:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Apologies for the mistaken warning. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:56, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

We all make mistakes :) Winbots 04:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Cluebot

Cluebot is listing User:ClueBot/PossibleVandalism for speedy deletion when something like this happens.-Wafulz 15:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I have taken the bot offline until I fix it. :) Winbots 17:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Your bot has removed my warning. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

That is because you edited the page while my bot was trying to edit the page. By the way, why were you trying to warn that user even though my bot reverted the vandalism? Winbots 17:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Let's dance!! // hackmiester (contact) 21:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

My concern about your username

Hello, Winbots, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

• If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
• If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as asking for a "third opinion", or requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
• You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus — either here or at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you. Q ^{T C} 10:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

I'd say the username is fine, it it was WinBot, then I could understand the problem, but WinBots is quite alright, I'd say. Nick 12:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

The policy is Rather clear on this. Q ^{T C} 13:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Winbots is derived from an organization that I was president of. It now no longer exists. The only reason I used this name was when I tried to create a username with the name I usually use, it was already taken. At the time of the account creation I was not aware of the Username policy. I wouldn't even consider it advertising because at the time of the account creation, my organization had ceased to exist. If you insist on me changing my name, I will. Winbots 17:28, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Wasn't the advertising that worried me, was the Bot part, a less scrupulous editor could report directly to UFA and you'd probably get blocked. Q ^{T C} 17:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Ok, names that I would accept (assuming an admin can move everything to the new name) are, in order of preference: Cobi or ClueNet. Though you may have problems with ClueNet since it is the name of the current organization that I am co-founder of. See here. Winbots 17:57, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

I personally don't have a problem with naming yourself ClueNet, the {{UsernameConcern}} template is preloaded with some slightly loaded phrases which makes it sound like I'm more upset then I really am. Really was looking for more of a "Hey here's the guidelines, just a FYI in case you might want to change your name so you don't have to worry about accidentally getting banned as a rogue bot" Personally don't mind if you keep it as-is, was just wanting to let you know of the policy and how it might affect you. Q ^{T C} 18:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

I have made a request to usurp the username Cobi (t). Winbots 18:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Clue Bot

Hi, great work with the bot! But in cases like this can you make the report the user to AIV thanks. --Chris ^g 11:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

The bot tries to normally. In that case it had an unusual tag on the end of the warning which confused the bot. The bot usually looks for <!-- Template:uw-*N[im] -->, where N is the number of the warning, and [im] is optional. So it didn't detect the last warning, so it added it's own. Winbots 17:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Cluebot

Hi, your bot is very good at catching at catching vandalism. I looked at the list of possible vandalism page and found several cases where ClueBot writes down it reverted a vandalism but it was in fact reverted by another user. It isn't a major problem but I was just curious whether this could be fixed. Thanks, --_Hdt83 ^Chat 04:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Ex:

Possible vandalism: Taco Bell was changed by 71.57.62.69 (c) (t) replacing content with 'Stoic eats at taco bell :3' on 2007-08-05T04:10:04Z ClueBot 04:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Corrected by ClueBot ClueBot 04:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

I'll see if I can correct that. It is a bug when it tries to revert, but didn't actually revert (edit conflict or such). It does recognize that, but I guess I forgot to tell it to leave off the "Corrected by ClueBot" comment. Winbots 17:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for the clarifications, much appreciated. Good work, and good luck, keeping the Bot in line that is. 209.244.42.97 20:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Your bot works fine. On August 5 209.244.42.97 blanked dozens of articles on ancient Egypt. He is presently under a level 4 warning for vandalism Rktect 01:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

209.244.42.97's report has been reopened. Winbots 02:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

I'd like to add that User:Rktect has just been blocked. 209.244.42.97 13:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Issued warning erased by a subsequent bot warning

Not a false positive report, but a warning I placed on User talk:71.207.171.160 (take a look at the history; I readded it in) was erased by the bot, which issued another warning right after mine, just to let you know. --BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 15:22, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that. That happens when you try to edit at the same time the bot tries to edit. What happens is this:

1. ClueBot requests the code for the page.
2. You add your warning.
3. ClueBot appends his warning to the end of the code he just got in step #1.
4. ClueBot submits the new code.
5. Your warning disappears.

Winbots 17:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)