Jump to content

Talk:Japanese submarine I-52 (1942): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Engr105th (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:
Anybody else have thoughts on it?<br /> [[User:Engr105th|Engr105th]] 20:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)<br />
Anybody else have thoughts on it?<br /> [[User:Engr105th|Engr105th]] 20:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)<br />
:: Folks, not having had any response to my post above of 24 May 2007, I took the liberty of adding "Japanese" to the sentence about it being the most advanced sub of its time. Seems to me that might even be questionable.<br />I am new to editing Wiki articles, though I've used them for a long time. If I'm wrong to do this, please post me a message ! [[User:Engr105th|Engr105th]] 03:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
:: Folks, not having had any response to my post above of 24 May 2007, I took the liberty of adding "Japanese" to the sentence about it being the most advanced sub of its time. Seems to me that might even be questionable.<br />I am new to editing Wiki articles, though I've used them for a long time. If I'm wrong to do this, please post me a message ! [[User:Engr105th|Engr105th]] 03:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

== Recording? ==
The article mentions sonobuoy and cockpit recordings. Does anyone know if these are available online? [[User:75.75.110.235|75.75.110.235]] 17:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:26, 10 July 2007

WikiProject iconMilitary history: Maritime / Asian / Japanese / World War II Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Maritime warfare task force
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
Japanese military history task force
Taskforce icon
World War II task force
WikiProject iconJapan Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 01:28, October 27, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

WikiProject iconShipwrecks Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

  • Lady Elizabeth (1879)
    • Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
    • Improve grammar
    • Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
    • Discuss desired additions -None
  1. Does anyone have any additional detail about the proposed uranium shipment on the I-52? - --mkamat 21:02, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
  2. The link to Rear Admiral Kojima Hideo points to the famous game developer Hideo Kojima, who was born in 1964. I don't know if they're related, but they're definitely not the same person. I'm removing this link. --Djakdarippa 14:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any word on the salvage?

OK, It's May 2006. Any word on the salvage operations, mentioned in the last paragraph?

Good question. I have found nothing on it. My suspicion is until they (investors) actually see some salvage gold, in advance, it would be hard to get backing for this effort. May 2007...Engr105th 20:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== Most advanced sub of WW2 ?? ==

I'm uncertain of the veracity of a statement in the paragraph "Type C-3 subs"...It says "They were the largest submarines ever built at that time, and were known as the most advanced submarines of their time."
They were most definitely the largest. But they were basically cargo vessels. One could easily say the German Elektroboots (e.g. Type 21 & 23's?) were the most advanced at least as far as technology - which is what most people mean by "advanced"...The Elektroboots were a bit later, but were under development about that time. Even if they weren't concurrent with the C-3 subs, the C-3's certainly were not "advanced" weapons...
Anybody else have thoughts on it?
Engr105th 20:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Folks, not having had any response to my post above of 24 May 2007, I took the liberty of adding "Japanese" to the sentence about it being the most advanced sub of its time. Seems to me that might even be questionable.
I am new to editing Wiki articles, though I've used them for a long time. If I'm wrong to do this, please post me a message ! Engr105th 03:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recording?

The article mentions sonobuoy and cockpit recordings. Does anyone know if these are available online? 75.75.110.235 17:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]