Jump to content

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Improved History
Some improvements in the procedure section
Line 36: Line 36:
The first insolvency resolution order under this code was passed by [[National Company Law Tribunal]] (NCLT) in the case of ''Synergies-Dooray Automotive Ltd'' on 14 August 2017. The plea for insolvency was submitted by company on 23 January 2017. The resolution plan was submitted to NCLT within a period of 180 days as required by the code, and the approval for the same was received on 2 August 2017 from the tribunal. The final order was uploaded on 14 August 2017 on the NCLT website.<ref name="lm0817">{{citation |title=NCLT okays first insolvency resolution scheme under IBC |date=16 August 2017 |url=http://www.livemint.com/Industry/qHRj0OlhehKDXFXFlckkoJ/NCLT-okays-first-insolvency-resolution-scheme-underIBC.html |work=[[Live Mint]]}}</ref>
The first insolvency resolution order under this code was passed by [[National Company Law Tribunal]] (NCLT) in the case of ''Synergies-Dooray Automotive Ltd'' on 14 August 2017. The plea for insolvency was submitted by company on 23 January 2017. The resolution plan was submitted to NCLT within a period of 180 days as required by the code, and the approval for the same was received on 2 August 2017 from the tribunal. The final order was uploaded on 14 August 2017 on the NCLT website.<ref name="lm0817">{{citation |title=NCLT okays first insolvency resolution scheme under IBC |date=16 August 2017 |url=http://www.livemint.com/Industry/qHRj0OlhehKDXFXFlckkoJ/NCLT-okays-first-insolvency-resolution-scheme-underIBC.html |work=[[Live Mint]]}}</ref>


==Key features==
==Key Provisions==
'''Insolvency Resolution''' : The Code outlines separate insolvency resolution processes for individuals, companies and partnership firms. The process may be initiated by either the debtor or the creditors. A maximum time limit, for completion of the insolvency resolution process, has been set for corporates and individuals. For companies, the process will have to be completed in 180 days, which may be extended by 90 days, if a majority of the creditors agree. For start ups (other than partnership firms), small companies and other companies (with asset less than Rs. 1 crore), resolution process would be completed within 90 days of initiation of request which may be extended by 45 days.<ref>{{citation |title=India Overhauls Century-Old Bankruptcy Laws in Win for Modi |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-11/india-overhauls-century-old-bankruptcy-laws-in-key-win-for-modi |work=[[Bloomberg News|Bloomberg]] |date=11 May 2016 }}</ref>
'''Insolvency Resolution''' : The Code outlines separate insolvency resolution processes for individuals, companies and partnership firms. The process may be initiated by either the debtor or the creditors. A maximum time limit, for completion of the insolvency resolution process, has been set for corporates and individuals. For companies, the process will have to be completed in 180 days, which may be extended by 90 days, if a majority of the creditors agree. For start ups (other than partnership firms), small companies and other companies (with asset less than Rs. 1 crore), resolution process would be completed within 90 days of initiation of request which may be extended by 45 days.<ref>{{citation |title=India Overhauls Century-Old Bankruptcy Laws in Win for Modi |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-11/india-overhauls-century-old-bankruptcy-laws-in-key-win-for-modi |work=[[Bloomberg News|Bloomberg]] |date=11 May 2016 }}</ref>


Line 48: Line 48:


==Procedure==
==Procedure==

A plea for insolvency is submitted to the adjudicating authority (NCLT in case of corporate debtors) by financial or operation creditors or the corporate debtor itself. The maximum time allowed to either accept or reject the plea is 14 days. If the plea is accepted, the tribunal has to appoint an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to draft a resolution plan within 180 days (extendable by 90 days). following which the Corporate Insolvency Resolution process is initiated by the court. For the said period, the board of directors of the company stands suspended, and the promoters do not have a say in the management of the company. The IRP, if required, can seek the support of the company's management for day-to-day operations. If the CIRP fails in reviving the company, the liquidation process is initiated.
=== Time Limit ===
The IBC envisions that the entire CIRP process must take place within 180 days of the admission of the application. A CIRP must be mandatorily completed within 330 days, including any extension or litigation period.<ref>S. 12, IBC</ref>

=== Initiating the CIRP ===
In the case of a corporate debtor, an application for insolvency proceedings must be submitted to the Adjudicating Authority (AA), which is the NCLT. The application may be filed by a financial creditor (Section 7), an operational creditor (Section 9), or the corporate debtor (Section 10) itself. Section 11 enumerates the persons ''not entitled'' to make an application, such as corporate debtor who was in a CIRP at the time of the application, or had been in one recently.

The maximum time allowed to consider the application is 14 days. If the application is allowed, the AA: (i) declares a moratorium; (ii) causes a public announcement of the CIRP process and calls for the submission of claims; and (iii) appoints an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).

=== Moratorium ===
On the date on which the insolvency commences, a ''moratorium'' is declared, and it remains in force until the end of the CIRP. The CIRP ends, either when the AA approves a resolution plan under Section 31(1), or when it passes a liquidation order under Section 33. The moratorium ensures that the CIRP has a free-rein and is the only mechanism through which claims are settled. It bars the institution of litigation against the corporate debtor, while at the same time suspending the corporate debtor's ability to move, sell, or transfer any of its assets. It bars actions both ''by'' and ''against'' the coporate debtor. However, the moratorium has certain exceptions, such as Section 14(2A), which allows the IRP to continue to supply of such goods and services as it considers necessary to preserve the value of the corporate debtor.

For the said period, the board of directors of the company stands suspended, and the promoters do not have a say in the management of the company. The IRP, if required, can seek the support of the company's management for day-to-day operations. If the CIRP fails in reviving the company, the liquidation process is initiated.


==Subsequent Amendments==
==Subsequent Amendments==

Revision as of 16:01, 31 March 2022

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
Parliament of India
  • An Act to consolidate and amend the laws relating to reorganisation and insolvency resolution of corporate persons, partnership firms and individuals in a time bound manner for maximisation of value of assets of such persons, to promote entrepreneurship, availability of credit and balance the interests of all the stakeholders including alteration in the order of priority of payment of Government dues and to establish an Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
CitationAct No. 31 of 2016
Territorial extentIndia
Passed byLok Sabha
Passed5 May 2016
Passed byRajya Sabha
Passed11 May 2016
Assented to28 May 2016
Commenced28 May 2016
Legislative history
First chamber: Lok Sabha
Bill titleThe Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
Bill citationBill No. 349 of 2015
Introduced byArun Jaitley
Introduced21 December 2015
Committee reportReport of the Joint Committee
Final stages
Reported from conference committee28 April 2016
Status: In force
Insolvency
Processes
Officials
Claimants
Restructuring
Avoidance regimes
Offences
Security
International
By country
Other

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) is an Indian law which creates a consolidated framework for insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings.

Background

Prior to the IBC, the legislative framework for insolvency and restructuring was fragmented across multiple legislations, such as the Companies Act 2013, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act (RDDBFI Act), 1993, and others.[1]

History

On 22 August 2014, the Ministry of Finance created the Bankruptcy Legislative Reforms Committee (BLRC). The committee was headed by T. K. Viswanathan, and tasked with drafting a new bankruptcy law. The Committee submitted its report, which included a draft bill, on 4 November 2015. A modified version of the draft bill, after the incorporation of public comments, was introduced in the Sixteenth Lok Sabha Lok Sabha by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley as the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2015.[2] The bill was tabled on 23 December 2015. A Joint Parliamentary Committee on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2015 (JPC) was set up and the bill was referred to it for detailed analysis. The JPC submitted its report, which included a new draft of the Bill, 28 April 2016.[3] It was passed by the Lok Sabha on 5 May 2016, and by the Rajya Sabha on 11 May 2016 respectively. Subsequently, it received assent from President Pranab Mukherjee and was notified in The Gazette of India on 28 May 2016.[4]

Early cases

The first insolvency resolution order under this code was passed by National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in the case of Synergies-Dooray Automotive Ltd on 14 August 2017. The plea for insolvency was submitted by company on 23 January 2017. The resolution plan was submitted to NCLT within a period of 180 days as required by the code, and the approval for the same was received on 2 August 2017 from the tribunal. The final order was uploaded on 14 August 2017 on the NCLT website.[5]

Key Provisions

Insolvency Resolution : The Code outlines separate insolvency resolution processes for individuals, companies and partnership firms. The process may be initiated by either the debtor or the creditors. A maximum time limit, for completion of the insolvency resolution process, has been set for corporates and individuals. For companies, the process will have to be completed in 180 days, which may be extended by 90 days, if a majority of the creditors agree. For start ups (other than partnership firms), small companies and other companies (with asset less than Rs. 1 crore), resolution process would be completed within 90 days of initiation of request which may be extended by 45 days.[6]

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2019 has increased the mandatory upper Time limit of 330 days including time spent in legal process to complete resolution process.[7]

Insolvency regulator: The Code establishes the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, to oversee the insolvency proceedings in the country and regulate the entities registered under it. The Board will have 10 members, including representatives from the Ministries of Finance and Law, and the Reserve Bank of India.[8]

Insolvency professionals: The insolvency process will be managed by licensed professionals. These professionals will also control the assets of the debtor during the insolvency process.[8]

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Adjudicator: The Code proposes two separate tribunals to oversee the process of insolvency resolution, for individuals and companies: (i) the National Company Law Tribunal for Companies and Limited Liability Partnership firms; and (ii) the Debt Recovery Tribunal for individuals and partnerships.[citation needed]

Procedure

Time Limit

The IBC envisions that the entire CIRP process must take place within 180 days of the admission of the application. A CIRP must be mandatorily completed within 330 days, including any extension or litigation period.[9]

Initiating the CIRP

In the case of a corporate debtor, an application for insolvency proceedings must be submitted to the Adjudicating Authority (AA), which is the NCLT. The application may be filed by a financial creditor (Section 7), an operational creditor (Section 9), or the corporate debtor (Section 10) itself. Section 11 enumerates the persons not entitled to make an application, such as corporate debtor who was in a CIRP at the time of the application, or had been in one recently.

The maximum time allowed to consider the application is 14 days. If the application is allowed, the AA: (i) declares a moratorium; (ii) causes a public announcement of the CIRP process and calls for the submission of claims; and (iii) appoints an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).

Moratorium

On the date on which the insolvency commences, a moratorium is declared, and it remains in force until the end of the CIRP. The CIRP ends, either when the AA approves a resolution plan under Section 31(1), or when it passes a liquidation order under Section 33. The moratorium ensures that the CIRP has a free-rein and is the only mechanism through which claims are settled. It bars the institution of litigation against the corporate debtor, while at the same time suspending the corporate debtor's ability to move, sell, or transfer any of its assets. It bars actions both by and against the coporate debtor. However, the moratorium has certain exceptions, such as Section 14(2A), which allows the IRP to continue to supply of such goods and services as it considers necessary to preserve the value of the corporate debtor.

For the said period, the board of directors of the company stands suspended, and the promoters do not have a say in the management of the company. The IRP, if required, can seek the support of the company's management for day-to-day operations. If the CIRP fails in reviving the company, the liquidation process is initiated.

Subsequent Amendments

The 2017 Amendment prohibits certain persons from submitting a resolution plan in case of defaults. These include: (i) wilful defaulters, (ii) promoters or management of the company if it has an outstanding non-performing debt for over a year, and (iii) disqualified directors, among others. Further, it bars the sale of property of a defaulter to such persons during liquidation.[10]

High-value cases

Company Debt Date of referral to NCLT Date of Resolution Recovery Amount Notes Reference
Essar Steel ₹490 billion (US$5.9 billion) June 2017 Dec 2019 ₹42,000 crore (equivalent to ₹520 billion or US$6.3 billion in 2023) SC delivered its final verdict and cleared way for Arcelor Mittal India and Nippon Steel Japan to form a joint venture to complete the takeover by end of Dec 2019. [11][12]
Bhushan Steel ₹440 billion (US$5.3 billion) 26 July 2017 May 2018 ₹36,400 crore (equivalent to ₹490 billion or US$5.8 billion in 2023) Tata Steel, through its wholly owned subsidiary Bamnipal Steel Ltd (BNPL), has acquired 72.65 per cent controlling stake in Bhushan Steel Ltd (BSL) for around Rs 36,400 crore. The company was selected as the highest bidder in March 2018 to buy a controlling stake in Bhushan Steel, as part of bankruptcy proceedings. [13][11][14][15]
Amtek Auto ₹12,700 crore (equivalent to ₹180 billion or US$2.1 billion in 2023) July 2017 July 2020 ₹2,700 crore (equivalent to ₹32 billion or US$380 million in 2023) NCLT approved a bid by US-based hedge fund Deccan Value Investors LP (DVIL).

Lenders agreed to a 80% haircut and the amount is payable over next seven years.

[16]
Bhushan Power & Steel ₹492 billion (US$5.9 billion) June 2017 March 2021 ₹19,350 crore (equivalent to ₹220 billion or US$2.6 billion in 2023) After four years of litigation involving ED & previous owners, CoC has voted in favor of JSW Steel. The deal will be completed by end of March 2021. [17]
Alok Industries ₹290 billion (US$3.5 billion) June 2017 March 2019 ₹5,050 crore (equivalent to ₹63 billion or US$750 million in 2023) Joint bid by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) and JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Co was approved by NCLT Ahmedabad last year. [11][18]
Jet Airways ₹146 billion (equivalent to ₹180 billion or US$2.2 billion in 2023) June 2019 CoC has accepted a ₹1,000-crore bid by a consortium of UK-based Kalrock Capital and UAE-based entrepreneur Murari Lal Jalan on Oct 17, 2020. [19]
Reliance Communications ₹33,000 crore (equivalent to ₹410 billion or US$4.9 billion in 2023) June 2019 Jan 2020 ₹23,000 crore (equivalent to ₹270 billion or US$3.2 billion in 2023) Reliance Jio will get the tower and fiber assets of Reliance Infratel Ltd for Rs 4,700 crore, UV Asset Reconstruction Co Ltd (UVARC) will get assets of RCom and Reliance Telecom (spectrum) for Rs 14,000 crore. [20]
Dewan Housing Finance Ltd ₹1,000 billion (equivalent to ₹1.2 trillion or US$15 billion in 2023) Nov 29, 2019 Jan 2021 ₹38,000 crore (equivalent to ₹430 billion or US$5.1 billion in 2023) First financial company to be referred to NCLT under IBC by RBI. It was acquired by Piramal Group, and, according to the resolution plan, Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd. (PCHFL) will merge with DHFL. [21][22][23]
Reliance Capital 6 December 2021
  • RBI superseded the board on Nov 29, 2021 with the intention of starting insolvency proceedings. The central bank appointed Nageswara Rao Y., a former executive director of Bank of Maharashtra, as the company’s administrator.
  • 54 companies have submitted EOI by March 25, 2022.
  • Companies have two options: they can either bid for the entire Reliance Capital or any one or more of its eight clusters (subsidiaries of Reliance Capital).
    • Reliance Capital subsidiaries include Reliance General Insurance, Reliance Nippon Life Insurance, Reliance Securities, Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company, Reliance Home Finance and Reliance Commercial Finance.
 [24][25][26]

References

  1. ^ "The Journey of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code". www.mondaq.com. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  2. ^ "PRS | Bill Track | The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2015". www.prsindia.org. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
  3. ^ "Joint Committee Report Summary" (PDF). PRS Legislative Research. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
  4. ^ http://www.indiacode.nic.in/acts-in-pdf/2016/201631.pdf [bare URL PDF]
  5. ^ "NCLT okays first insolvency resolution scheme under IBC", Live Mint, 16 August 2017
  6. ^ "India Overhauls Century-Old Bankruptcy Laws in Win for Modi", Bloomberg, 11 May 2016
  7. ^ Dutt, Ishita Ayan (28 October 2019). "IBC resolutions exceed new time limit of 330 days prescribed by govt". Business Standard India.
  8. ^ a b "Legislative Brief of the Code" (PDF). PRS India. Retrieved 18 August 2016.
  9. ^ S. 12, IBC
  10. ^ "PRS | Bill Track | The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2017". www.prsindia.org. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
  11. ^ a b c Rebello, Joel (14 March 2018), "Why resolution of these 10 NPA accounts will be a crucial test for IBC", The Economic Times
  12. ^ "Essar Steel: Finally bankers expect money next month". The Financial Express. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
  13. ^ "L&T moves NCLT to be declared as secured creditor in Bhushan Steel insolvency", Live Mint, 8 March 2018
  14. ^ "Tata Steel subsidiary acquires 72% stake in Bhushan Steel". Jagranjosh.com. 19 May 2018. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
  15. ^ "Bhushan Steel Acquisition By Tata Steel: Piyush Goyal Calls It Historic Breakthrough". NDTV.com. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
  16. ^ Noronha, Gaurav (10 July 2020). "NCLT approves Amtek Auto resolution plan". The Economic Times. Retrieved 9 July 2020.
  17. ^ Lele, Ishita Ayan Dutt & Abhijit (5 March 2021). "Lenders with majority vote for closing Bhushan Power deal with JSW Steel". Business Standard India. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
  18. ^ "Reliance Industries gets NCLT approval for Alok Industries - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 30 December 2019.
  19. ^ Kundu, Shayan Ghosh,Rhik (19 October 2020). "Jet will need more capital post-rescue". mint. Retrieved 19 October 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ^ "Lenders approve Rs 23,000 crore resolution plan for Reliance Communications". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
  21. ^ Reuters, Contributor Chris Thomas. "India cenbank moves to begin bankruptcy proceedings against DHFL". www.nasdaq.com. Retrieved 1 December 2019. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  22. ^ Chatterjee, Dev (17 January 2021). "Banks to get 33% of dues spread over five years from DHFL resolution". Business Standard India. Retrieved 17 January 2021.
  23. ^ Panda, Subrata (29 September 2021). "Piramal Group acquires DHFL for total consideration of Rs 34,250 cr". Business Standard India. Retrieved 29 September 2021.
  24. ^ Kant, Krishna (30 November 2021). "Why RBI move to supersede Reliance Capital board is par for the course". Business Standard India. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  25. ^ Gopakumar, Gopika (30 November 2021). "RBI appoints 3-member advisory panel to assist Reliance Capital administrator". mint. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  26. ^ Chatterjee, Dev (27 March 2022). "Tata AIG, ICICI Lombard join race to buy insurance units of Reliance Cap". Business Standard India. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Insolvency_and_Bankruptcy_Code,_2016&oldid=1080328019"