Wikipedia talk:Administrators: Difference between revisions
Floquenbeam (talk | contribs) →Additional requirement of this nomine?: again with this idiocy? |
Evilphoenix (talk | contribs) →Inactivity - Three year clause: new section |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
*I've moved that draft to mainspace, although this isn't strictly the right forum to request it. The reason the page was protected against creation wasn't any sort of confusion with that other player, it was just that some person called Mohamed Imran liked writing articles about himself even though he wasn't remotely significant. '''''[[User:Hut 8.5|<span style="color:#FF0000;">Hut 8.5</span>]]''''' 14:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC) |
*I've moved that draft to mainspace, although this isn't strictly the right forum to request it. The reason the page was protected against creation wasn't any sort of confusion with that other player, it was just that some person called Mohamed Imran liked writing articles about himself even though he wasn't remotely significant. '''''[[User:Hut 8.5|<span style="color:#FF0000;">Hut 8.5</span>]]''''' 14:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Inactivity - Three year clause == |
|||
I've been researching the inactivity policy, and I can't find the source for the three year inactivity clause. The original inactivity RfC from 2011 is linked nicely, but that RFC didnt mention the three year thing. Checking the diffs on this page for when that was added to the policy page(2013ish?), the only diffs I found referenced "the recent RFC's" but didnt provide a link (hint: permalinks are a GOOD thing) but so far I haven't had much luck tracking down the relevant discussion, which I would like to add a link to. Could somebody link me or clue me in the direction to look? Thanks, [[User:Evilphoenix|Evilphoenix]] <sup><small><b>[[User_talk:Evilphoenix|Talk]]</b></small></sup> 21:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:32, 11 November 2017
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Administrators page. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | The project page associated with this talk page is an official policy on Wikipedia. Policies have wide acceptance among editors and are considered a standard for all users to follow. Please review policy editing recommendations before making any substantive change to this page. Always remember to keep cool when editing, and don't panic. |
 | Wikipedia Help NA‑class Top‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | NOTE: This talk page is not the place to post questions for administrators.
|
| NOTE: This talk page is not the place to request yourself as an administrator. For Requests for Adminship, see WP:RfA. |
 | This page has been cited as a source by a notable professional or academic publication: Stvilia, B. et al. Information Quality Discussions in Wikipedia. University of Illinois U-C. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Request to start Mohamed Imran
The page Mohamed Imran is prevented from creation and can only be created by administrators. Imran Mohamed (also known as Kuda Imma, due to the similar names with Imran Mohamed who is commonly known as Imma) is also a Maldives national football team goalkeeper. I believe it is prevemted because of similar name confusion between the goalkeeper Imran Mohamed. Mohamed Imran was a back-up goalkeeper of national team until Imran Mohamed retired. Earlier this month, Mohamed Imran also retired from national team at the age of 29. I have also added Not to be confused with.. tag on Mohamed Imran's sub page by me. (User:ZZ47/Mohamed Imran) ZZ47 (talk) 14:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- I've moved that draft to mainspace, although this isn't strictly the right forum to request it. The reason the page was protected against creation wasn't any sort of confusion with that other player, it was just that some person called Mohamed Imran liked writing articles about himself even though he wasn't remotely significant. Hut 8.5 14:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Inactivity - Three year clause
I've been researching the inactivity policy, and I can't find the source for the three year inactivity clause. The original inactivity RfC from 2011 is linked nicely, but that RFC didnt mention the three year thing. Checking the diffs on this page for when that was added to the policy page(2013ish?), the only diffs I found referenced "the recent RFC's" but didnt provide a link (hint: permalinks are a GOOD thing) but so far I haven't had much luck tracking down the relevant discussion, which I would like to add a link to. Could somebody link me or clue me in the direction to look? Thanks, Evilphoenix Talk 21:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)