Jump to content

Birth Control (film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Removing from Category:English-language films in subcat using Cat-a-lot
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| name = Birth Control
| name = Birth Control
| image = Birth Control (1917) - 1.jpg
| image = Birth Control (1917) - 1.jpg

| image_size =
| alt =
| alt =
| caption = Two page advertisement in the 30 March 1917 ''Variety''
| caption = Two page advertisement in the 30 March 1917 ''Variety''
Line 32: Line 32:
|opinion =230
|opinion =230
|date =1915
|date =1915
|url=http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=236&invol=230}}</ref> which held that the exhibition of films did not constitute free speech.
|url=http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=236&invol=230}}</ref> which held that the exhibition of films did not constitute free speech.{{Citation needed|date=February 2023}}


The banning of ''Birth Control'' was upheld by the [[New York Court of Appeals]] on the grounds that a film on [[family planning]] may be censored "in the interest of morality, decency, and public safety and welfare."<ref>[https://casetext.com/case/message-photo-play-co-inc-v-bell ''Message Photo-Play Co., Inc. V. Bell''], Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 179 App. Div. 13 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917).</ref>
The banning of ''Birth Control'' was upheld by the [[New York Court of Appeals]] on the grounds that a film on [[family planning]] may be censored "in the interest of morality, decency, and public safety and welfare."<ref>[https://casetext.com/case/message-photo-play-co-inc-v-bell ''Message Photo-Play Co., Inc. V. Bell''], Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 179 App. Div. 13 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917).</ref>
Line 49: Line 49:
{{DEFAULTSORT:Birth Control (Film)}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Birth Control (Film)}}
[[Category:1917 films]]
[[Category:1917 films]]
[[Category:1917 lost films]]
[[Category:American black-and-white films]]
[[Category:American black-and-white films]]
[[Category:Birth control]]
[[Category:Birth control]]
Line 62: Line 63:
[[Category:Obscenity controversies in film]]
[[Category:Obscenity controversies in film]]
[[Category:1910s English-language films]]
[[Category:1910s English-language films]]
[[Category:1910s American films]]
[[Category:English-language documentary films]]




{{1910s-documentary-film-stub}}
{{1910s-documentary-film-stub}}
{{birth-control-stub}}

Latest revision as of 02:08, 5 September 2024

Birth Control
Two page advertisement in the 30 March 1917 Variety
Written byMargaret Sanger
Produced byMargaret Sanger
StarringMargaret Sanger
Production
company
Distributed byMessage Photo-Play Co.
Release date
  • April 1917 (1917-04)
Running time
5 reels
LanguageSilent (English intertitles)

Birth Control (also known as The New World) is a lost[1] 1917 American documentary film produced by and starring Margaret Sanger and describing her family planning work. It was the first film banned under the 1915 ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio,[2] which held that the exhibition of films did not constitute free speech.[citation needed]

The banning of Birth Control was upheld by the New York Court of Appeals on the grounds that a film on family planning may be censored "in the interest of morality, decency, and public safety and welfare."[3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ American Silent Feature Film Survival Database:Birth Control
  2. ^ Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 236 U.S. 230 (1915).
  3. ^ Message Photo-Play Co., Inc. V. Bell, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 179 App. Div. 13 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917).
[edit]