Talk:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: reply |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
||
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Miyagawa|< |
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Miyagawa</span>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">(talk)</span>]] 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
||
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. I'll give it a read through now and add any points that arise below. [[User:Miyagawa|< |
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. I'll give it a read through now and add any points that arise below. [[User:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Miyagawa</span>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">(talk)</span>]] 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Ratings: "and with 7 days after airing, reported a total of 6.7 million viewers with 2.8 rating" - somehow doesn't sound quite right, I'm thinking that "and within 7 days after airing, it reported a total..." might be better. |
:Ratings: "and with 7 days after airing, reported a total of 6.7 million viewers with 2.8 rating" - somehow doesn't sound quite right, I'm thinking that "and within 7 days after airing, it reported a total..." might be better. |
||
And that is quite literally the only issue I have with this nomination. Placing this one on hold until rectified, which I'm sure won't take too long. Good job! [[User:Miyagawa|< |
And that is quite literally the only issue I have with this nomination. Placing this one on hold until rectified, which I'm sure won't take too long. Good job! [[User:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Miyagawa</span>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">(talk)</span>]] 00:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Firefly_%28Fringe%29&diff=417177054&oldid=416239974 Fixed!]. Please let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks! [[User:Ruby2010|< |
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Firefly_%28Fringe%29&diff=417177054&oldid=416239974 Fixed!]. Please let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks! [[User:Ruby2010|<span style="color:green;">Ruby2010</span>]] [[User talk:Ruby2010|<span style="color:maroon;">talk</span>]] 00:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
:'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review''' (see [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|here]] for criteria) |
|||
#It is '''reasonably well written'''. |
|||
#:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''. |
|||
#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''. |
|||
#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It follows the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''. |
|||
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It is '''stable'''. |
|||
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''', where possible and appropriate. |
|||
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} b ''(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} |
|||
#:: |
|||
#'''Overall''': |
|||
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} |
|||
#:: <!-- Template:GAList --> |
|||
All good, happy to grade this one as a GA! [[User:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Miyagawa</span>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">(talk)</span>]] 09:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:43, 3 February 2023
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. I'll give it a read through now and add any points that arise below. Miyagawa (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ratings: "and with 7 days after airing, reported a total of 6.7 million viewers with 2.8 rating" - somehow doesn't sound quite right, I'm thinking that "and within 7 days after airing, it reported a total..." might be better.
And that is quite literally the only issue I have with this nomination. Placing this one on hold until rectified, which I'm sure won't take too long. Good job! Miyagawa (talk) 00:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed!. Please let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks! Ruby2010 talk 00:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
All good, happy to grade this one as a GA! Miyagawa (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)