Jump to content

Talk:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
GA Review: reply
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>


'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">Miyagawa</font>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">(talk)</font>]] 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Miyagawa</span>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">(talk)</span>]] 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->


I'll be reviewing this article shortly. I'll give it a read through now and add any points that arise below. [[User:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">Miyagawa</font>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">(talk)</font>]] 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. I'll give it a read through now and add any points that arise below. [[User:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Miyagawa</span>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">(talk)</span>]] 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


:Ratings: "and with 7 days after airing, reported a total of 6.7 million viewers with 2.8 rating" - somehow doesn't sound quite right, I'm thinking that "and within 7 days after airing, it reported a total..." might be better.
:Ratings: "and with 7 days after airing, reported a total of 6.7 million viewers with 2.8 rating" - somehow doesn't sound quite right, I'm thinking that "and within 7 days after airing, it reported a total..." might be better.


And that is quite literally the only issue I have with this nomination. Placing this one on hold until rectified, which I'm sure won't take too long. Good job! [[User:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">Miyagawa</font>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">(talk)</font>]] 00:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
And that is quite literally the only issue I have with this nomination. Placing this one on hold until rectified, which I'm sure won't take too long. Good job! [[User:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Miyagawa</span>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">(talk)</span>]] 00:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Firefly_%28Fringe%29&diff=417177054&oldid=416239974 Fixed!]. Please let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks! [[User:Ruby2010|<font color="green">Ruby2010</font>]] [[User talk:Ruby2010|<font color="maroon">talk</font>]] 00:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Firefly_%28Fringe%29&diff=417177054&oldid=416239974 Fixed!]. Please let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks! [[User:Ruby2010|<span style="color:green;">Ruby2010</span>]] [[User talk:Ruby2010|<span style="color:maroon;">talk</span>]] 00:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

:'''[[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review''' (see [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|here]] for criteria)

#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|Yes}}
#::
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''.
#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|Yes}}
#::
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|Yes}}
#::
#It follows the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|Yes}}
#::
#It is '''stable'''.
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|Yes}}
#::
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''', where possible and appropriate.
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|Yes}} b ''(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|Yes}}
#::
#'''Overall''':
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|Yes}}
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->

All good, happy to grade this one as a GA! [[User:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Miyagawa</span>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<span style="font-family:Verdana;">(talk)</span>]] 09:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:43, 3 February 2023

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. I'll give it a read through now and add any points that arise below. Miyagawa (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings: "and with 7 days after airing, reported a total of 6.7 million viewers with 2.8 rating" - somehow doesn't sound quite right, I'm thinking that "and within 7 days after airing, it reported a total..." might be better.

And that is quite literally the only issue I have with this nomination. Placing this one on hold until rectified, which I'm sure won't take too long. Good job! Miyagawa (talk) 00:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed!. Please let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks! Ruby2010 talk 00:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

All good, happy to grade this one as a GA! Miyagawa (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]