View source for User talk:Typhoon2013/Archive8

{{Automatic archive navigator}}
{{User:Typhoon2013/Archivetalks}}
This is the 8th Archive of Typhoon2013's talk page. Archive 8 includes events during '''2020'''.

== Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup! ==

Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found '''[[Wikipedia:WikiCup|here]]'''. If you have not yet signed up, you can '''[[Wikipedia:WikiCup/2020 signups|add your name here]]''' and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup|WikiCup talk page]]. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are {{User4|Sturmvogel 66}}, {{User4|Godot13}}, {{User4|Vanamonde93}} and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=927052004 -->

== WikiCup 2020 March newsletter ==

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:   

*{{flagicon|New York (state)}} [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]], a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
*[[File:Royal standard of England (1406–1603).svg|22px|England]] [[User:Gog the Mild|Gog the Mild]] came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
*{{flagicon|United States}} [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
*{{flagicon|Somerset}} [[User:Harrias|Harrias]] came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
*[[File:Pirate Flag.svg|22px|Pirate flag]] [[User:CaptainEek|CaptainEek]] was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing [[Cactus wren]] to featured article status.
*The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included {{flagicon|United States}} [[User:L293D|L293D]], {{flagicon|Venezuela}} [[User:Kingsif|Kingsif]], {{flagicon|Antarctica}} [[User:Enwebb|Enwebb]],  {{flagicon|ENG}} [[User:Lee Vilenski|Lee Vilenski]] and {{flagicon|Nepal}} [[User:CAPTAIN MEDUSA|CAPTAIN MEDUSA]]. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement). 

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews]].

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small>  [[User:Godot13|Godot13]] ([[User talk:Godot13|talk]]), [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]), [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=941428672 -->

== WikiCup newsletter correction ==

There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; {{flagicon|United States}} [[User:L293D|L293D]] should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, {{flagicon|United States}} [[User:Dunkleosteus77|Dunkleosteus77]] should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=941428672 -->

== Speedy deletion nomination of Typhoon Phanfone ==

Hello, Typhoon2013, 

Welcome to Wikipedia!  I edit here too, under the username [[User:Hughesdarren|Hughesdarren]] and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged [[Typhoon Phanfone]] for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain ''any'' encyclopedic content. You may find our [[Wikipedia:Writing better articles|guide for writing quality articles]] to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can <span class="plainlinks">'''[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{urlencode:Talk:Typhoon Phanfone}}&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion]'''</span> but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Typhoon+Phanfone&subtype=delete|deleting administrator}}.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Hughesdarren<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And, don't forget to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> . Thanks!

<small>Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.</small><!-- Template:Nocontent-warn-NPF -->

[[User:Hughesdarren|Hughesdarren]] ([[User talk:Hughesdarren|talk]]) 21:14, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

== webcitation.org ==

FYI: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tropical_Storm_Talas_%282011%29&type=revision&diff=947983281&oldid=947256037] I believe you are the editor adding these? It's creating link rot in many articles. Use the original URL in the {{para|url}} field as designed, or it creates link rot. Archive providers stop working - we can move it to a different archive provider, but it we don't know the original/source {{para|url}} then it's a goner. - [[User:GreenC|<span style="color: #006A4E;">'''Green'''</span>]][[User talk:GreenC|<span style="color: #093;">'''C'''</span>]] 14:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
:{{Ping|GreenC}} I would be very surprised if Typhoon2013 was responsible for the addition of the links you mention - bearing in mind that he has only edited the article in question [https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/usersearch.py?name=Typhoon2013&page=Tropical_Storm_Talas_%282011%29&server=enwiki&max= 7 times] and that the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Typhoon2013 2013 in his name] is deliberate.[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 00:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
::You are correct my apologies. It was added by the article creator. -- [[User:GreenC|<span style="color: #006A4E;">'''Green'''</span>]][[User talk:GreenC|<span style="color: #093;">'''C'''</span>]] 00:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

== Typhoon Committee ==

FYI the Typhoon Committee meeting was cancelled this year, as a result we can not out any names down as retired yet.[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 20:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|Jason Rees}} Yep I was already aware. I thought they would be delaying the meeting until the end of May, though? From the last page of [http://www.typhooncommittee.org/52nd/docs/final/VC%C2%A0TC52%C2%A0Report_ADOPTED.pdf this]. -- <span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span> 01:18, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
::Well lets wait and see how things play out as its likely going to be postponed again if things continue as they are! However, if you were already aware that the meeting was cancelled, why did you re-add the retired names the other day? [[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 23:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Jason Rees}} I do not recall re-adding the retired names "the other day". However would [http://www.typhooncommittee.org/52nd/docs/item%2014/14.2%20Replacement%20for%20Typhoon%20Names.pdf this] count? -- <span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span> 01:08, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
::::No it doesnt count as it is just a DRAFT as a result until the committee meets we can not add them in.[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 18:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

== Proof ==

Do you have any [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tropical_Storm_Irving_(1992)&curid=54703504&diff=951443270&oldid=894621668 proof] of this? I feel like I've ran into a similar problem before. [[User:Yellow Evan|Y]][[User talk:Yellow Evan|E]] <sup>[[2018 PHS|Pacific]]</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Yellow Evan|<sup>Hurricane</sup>]] 21:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|Yellow Evan}} As per my edit in the 1992 PTS, Gary turned out to be "Ditang". No other TCs formed between Gary and Janis with the exception of Irving that was within the PAR. I have emailed PAGASA recently once again to provide a source of confirmed PAGASA storms from 1989 through to 1996. My source that I have used to confirm about Gary is in the 1992 talk page. -- <span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span> 01:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

== The 40th Edition of The Hurricane Herald ==

[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 40]]

== WikiCup 2020 May newsletter ==

The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

*{{flagicon|New York (state)}} [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]], with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
*[[File:Royal standard of England (1406–1603).svg|22px|England]] [[User:Gog the Mild|Gog the Mild]], with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
*{{flagicon|BWA}} [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]], with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews  
*{{flagicon|Somerset}} [[User:Harrias|Harrias]], with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
*{{flagicon|ENG}} [[User:Lee Vilenski|Lee Vilenski]] with 869 points, [[File:Blason Gondor.svg|22px|link=Gondor|Gondor]] [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]] with 801, {{flagicon|Venezuela}} [[User:Kingsif|Kingsif]] with 719, {{flagicon|Cascadia}} [[User:SounderBruce|SounderBruce]] with 710, {{flagicon|United States}} [[User:Dunkleosteus77|Dunkleosteus77]] with 608 and {{flagicon|Mexico}} [[User:MX|MX]] with 515.

The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed]] (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:Godot13|Godot13]] ([[User talk:Godot13|talk]]), [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]), [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]]. - [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 17:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=953057219 -->
== Re: Checkup ==

Hey there Typhoon2013! I'm doing OK - I've been busy in RL working (I'm lucky I still have a job!) and just trying to manage my sanity in general. I'm working on a few projects on Wikipedia, including trying to maintain 2005 AHS as FA, an active FAC for [[Effects of Hurricane Wilma in Mexico]], and eventually getting [[Hurricane Wilma]] to FA. I'll probably be editing more as of next week, when one of my jobs finishes up (I teach music at a community college). 

As for your question of getting an article to GA, there are a lot of things to do, but it's a few basic elements. 
# Is it comprehensive? Will a quick Google search reveal information that isn't in the article?
# Are the sources reliable? Are you mostly using blogs or original research?
# Is all of the content sourced? Do the citations use [[Template:Cite web]], with proper entries for all of the related fields?
# Is everything spelled right and the grammar makes sense?

If the answer to all of them is yes, then the article should pass a GA nomination pretty easily. That can be more difficult for costlier/deadlier storms, or for older storms. That's why most new users start with low-impact storms, or List articles. So, with all of that, do you have an article that you're eyeing toward improving? ♫ [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>)  14:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|Hurricanehink}} On a side not too, wow I really forgot you did music too! I am on to music too, and currently doing a music theory lecture in university. -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 01:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
::Ah nice! Nothing like music theory to understand why songs work the way they do. As for your failed GAN's, it looks like the articles were pretty good. [[Tropical Storm Haikui (2017)]] looks the most incomplete of the three of them, as the MH is incomplete. It looks like the GA reviews identified what you can do for the articles, you just needed more time to finish them? Is that it? If that's the case, you should go back to the articles and clean them up, because they look pretty good :) ♫ [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>)  14:27, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Hurricanehink}} Yep! I am more into composition, though, but music theory was the only available one for my timetable :( . And also yes, my plan is to work in those articles if I also have the same (but they will be my priority!) as I currently have loads of work in uni atm. Definitely will do it before tropical activity flares up again for sure. But yea I really want to complete those articles because I have been here editing for years without having a GA article. -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 23:34, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
== Tropical status of Ex-Mangga ==

{{ping|Typhoon2013}} The BOM has not provided any official product to say that the system has dissipated or transitioned into an extratropical low, and until that occurs, we cannot say that it has happened. Weakening below tropical cyclone status does '''''not''''' imply dissipation. By that logic, you could not even say the system has formed until it becomes a Category 1 tropical cyclone. Clearly that is not the case. In any case, the system is (as of 10:38 UTC on 23 May) still referred to as a tropical system in no fewer than 27 locations on the BOM website, and I only looked for five minutes. [[User:ChocolateTrain|ChocolateTrain]] ([[User talk:ChocolateTrain|talk]]) 10:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|ChocolateTrain}} Since I do recall you being someone who looks more into the BoM website more so often than anyone else here then sure. I just would like to see what sources from the BoM state that if I may ask. In fact, we actually had a similar discussion regarding this with JR in May last year [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2018–19_Australian_region_cyclone_season regarding Lorna], and as per JR, it is unclear from the BoM whether "weakening below TC status" could either mean a TL or an EXTC. For this moment I will accept your revert and my apologies, but of course, we will have to wait for the BT for the BoM's decision. -- <span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span> 11:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

== Usman ==

Thank you for creating Usman. Did you see the topic on the project talk page? [[User:Hurricane Noah|<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200"><b>Noah</b></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Hurricane Noah|<span style="color:#ff0000"><b>Talk</b></span>]]</sup> 12:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|Hurricane Noah}} Oh no worries I got bored so I made it haha, and I did remember saying that this article was a HUGE must! And surprisingly I just saw the project talk page just now and wow. Well I mean feel free to tweak it a bit or something, this was a bit rushed I guess, but the prose needs working on for sure. -- <span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span> 12:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
::if you would like to help with the topic, we still need a lot of work done in WPAC. [[User:Hurricane Noah|<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200"><b>Noah</b></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Hurricane Noah|<span style="color:#ff0000"><b>Talk</b></span>]]</sup> 12:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
:: Thank you for the two articles you have done thus far. Would you be able to help with getting a majority of the smaller storms up to C class as well? You don't need to do the large storms as they will require a group effort to complete. [[User:Hurricane Noah|<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200"><b>Noah</b></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Hurricane Noah|<span style="color:#ff0000"><b>Talk</b></span>]]</sup> 21:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Hurricane Noah}} Yep sure. The next two weeks for me however is pretty busy for me so I might have to reduce my edits. However this will be my main priorities now on the smaller storm articles. I will try my best to raise as many of these articles to higher standard this year. :) -- <span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span> 23:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Tropical Storm Nanmadol (2017)]]==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Tropical Storm Nanmadol (2017)]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.  <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Yellow Evan|Yellow Evan]]</small> -- [[User:Yellow Evan|Yellow Evan]] ([[User talk:Yellow Evan|talk]]) 19:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

== Happy birthday! ==

Good afternoon, my name is Rebestalic

I happen to be a fellow New Zealander and hail from <s> a city that's better than yours </s> a more populous city up north. I was curious to know who updated the New Zealand statistics for COVID-19 today, and there you were

Now, to the point--I was immediately drawn by a rather large picture of a hurricane on your userpage. One of your superimposed userboxes shows that you have recently turned eighteen. So, yes, happy birthday fellow New Zealander

[[User:Rebestalic|<span style="font-family:Calibri light; font-variant:small-caps"><span style="color:#00bfff">'''Rebestalic'''</span></span>]][[User talk:Rebestalic#bottom|<sup style="color:#228b22;font-family:Calibri">'''[leave a message....]'''</sup>]] 02:12, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|Rebestalic}} sorry for the late reply, but thank you so much! I see you're from New Zealand too though hehe. :) -- <span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span> 01:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

== 41st edition of The Hurricane Herald ==

[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 41]]

== WikiCup 2020 July newsletter ==

The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

*{{flagicon|New York (state)}} [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]], with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
*{{flagicon|BWA}} [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man ]], with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
*[[File:Royal standard of England (1406–1603).svg|22px|England]] [[User:Gog the Mild|Gog the Mild]], a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.

Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, {{flagicon|Denmark}} [[User:MPJ-DK|MPJ-DK]] added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process. 

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed]] (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:Godot13|Godot13]] ([[User talk:Godot13|talk]]), [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]), [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]), [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=964294896 -->

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Tropical Storm Nanmadol (2017)]] ==
The article [[Tropical Storm Nanmadol (2017)]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[File:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Tropical Storm Nanmadol (2017)]] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a '''bold link''' under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can [[Template_talk:Did_you_know#To_nominate_an_article|nominate it]] within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Yellow Evan|Yellow Evan]]</small> -- [[User:Yellow Evan|Yellow Evan]] ([[User talk:Yellow Evan|talk]]) 00:41, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

== Your 2018 articles ==

Hey, I was just wondering if you had considered GANing any of your 2018 articles? I am hoping we can get a GT done before KN has to leave in January (for an extensive time period). [[User:Hurricane Noah|<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200"><b>Noah</b></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Hurricane Noah|<span style="color:#ff0000"><b>Talk</b></span>]]</sup> 23:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|Hurricane Noah}} Hi. Yea sorry for the reduced work, study has really been the priority hence why my edits are really just the updating of the WPac storms :( Very fortunately though, I am in a mid tri break right now, so I could re-look at my 2018 articles. However if you are specifically looking at an actual 2018 storm, then the closest article for me to do a GAN is Usman. :) Where is Keane going on January? Haven't been active on discord lol omg so sorry I'll really owe it up to you. -- <span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span> 10:04, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
:And yeah I'll look at Usman for the time being. I just need to relook at sources and find any missing information. I don't want it to become another Nanmadol where it took 2 GANs and took a while haha. -- <span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span> 10:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Tropical Depression Usman]] ==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Tropical Depression Usman]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[File:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Hurricane Noah|Hurricane Noah]]</small> -- [[User:Hurricane Noah|Hurricane Noah]] ([[User talk:Hurricane Noah|talk]]) 01:21, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

== WikiCup 2020 September newsletter ==

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

*[[File:Free Hong Kong flag.svg|23px|link=Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our time|Free Hong Kong]] [[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]], with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items; 
*{{flagicon|Indonesia}}[[User:HaEr48|HaEr48]] with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs; 
*{{flagicon|ENG}} [[User:Lee Vilenski|Lee Vilenski]] with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews]]. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:Godot13|Godot13]] ([[User talk:Godot13|talk]]), [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]), [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]), [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 19:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=975222802 -->

== 42nd edition of The Hurricane Herald! ==

[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 42]]

== Usman ==

I hope you aren't discouraged on Usman.... It will require some work and I may be too strict on reviewing as I try to go to FA a lot nowadays, but I just want to help you improve your writing and research. [[User:Hurricane Noah|<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200"><b>Noah</b></span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Hurricane Noah|<span style="color:#ff0000"><b>Talk</b></span>]]</sup> 17:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Tropical Depression Usman]] ==
The article [[Tropical Depression Usman]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has failed [[File:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Tropical Depression Usman]] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. <!-- Template:GANotice result=fail --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Hurricane Noah|Hurricane Noah]]</small> -- [[User:Hurricane Noah|Hurricane Noah]] ([[User talk:Hurricane Noah|talk]]) 11:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

== 43rd edition of The Hurricane Herald ==

[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 43]]

== WikiCup 2020 November newsletter ==

The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new '''Champion''' is {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Lee Vilenski}}, the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Gog the Mild}}. In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|The Rambling Man}} was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Epicgenius}} close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Hog Farm}}, {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|HaEr48}}, {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Harrias}} and {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Bloom6132}}. The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

*{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Gog the Mild}} wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
*{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Bloom6132}} win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
*{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Rhododendrites}} wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
*{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Lee Vilenski}} wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
*{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Epicgenius}} wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
*{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|MPJ-DK}} wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
*{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|The Rambling Man}} wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
*{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Epicgenius}} wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
*{{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11|Bloom6132}} wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to '''[[Wikipedia:WikiCup/2021 signups|sign up to participate]]'''; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:Godot13|Godot13]], [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]], [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=983606445 -->

== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=990308339 -->

== Tropical Low 01U ==

{{ping|Typhoon2013}} Hi there! I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to let you know why I think it's best that we write "Tropical Low 01U" rather than just "01U" in the strongest storm section of the main infobox. The layman—for whom the article is primarily written—is not going to know what 01U means without any context. There's no way of knowing whether it's a tropical cyclone or a tropical low or something else unless you're familiar with the BOM's conventions or Wikipedia's conventions, neither of which can be assumed of the average reader. Listing the system as "Tropical Low 01U" makes it clear to the reader exactly what the system is, rather than just giving an identifier code which doesn't mean anything to most people. This isn't an issue when the strongest system is a named tropical cyclone, because most people will be able to infer that the strongest storm being, for example, "Yasi", means a tropical cyclone called Yasi. We wouldn't need to write Tropical Cyclone Yasi in such an instance, because it's obvious. Just thought I'd clear up my reasoning here. [[User:ChocolateTrain|ChocolateTrain]] ([[User talk:ChocolateTrain|talk]]) 09:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
:On a side note: TCWC Perth, Darwin and Brisbane are gone instead the BoM is operating as 1 TCWC.[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 14:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
::I actually don't think it is a problem to have Tropical Low or not. The windspeed is given alongside the 'name' of that low so people know how strong it became. Besides, this is a puny low that pretty much affected nothing and the public at large had no idea the low existed.--[[User:CyclonicallyDeranged|CyclonicallyDeranged]] ([[User talk:CyclonicallyDeranged|talk]]) 19:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
:::{{ping|ChocolateTrain}} Hope you are doing well too! Yeah you have made a good point and I do agree. Honestly as per what {{ping|CyclonicallyDeranged}} has mentioned I do not mind on adding it or not, besides this is for sure going to be temporary as we got stronger named storms soon. -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 04:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

== 44th edition of The Hurricane Herald! ==

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 44}}

== Tropical low identifiers in the Australian region ==

{{ping|Typhoon2013}} Hi again! I saw that you removed the Coral Sea subtropical low from the [[2020–21 Australian region cyclone season]] article because it's been confirmed that the next tropical low will receive the designation 02U and not 03U. This reasoning would make sense normally (in the Atlantic basin, for example), but it doesn't hold up in the Australian region. The BOM only issues xxU identifier codes to tropical lows which they consider to have at least a moderate chance of developing into a named tropical cyclone within the following seven days. Hence, weak tropical—or in this instance, subtropical—lows which are still officially tracked and advised upon do not receive designations. Therefore, we can't discount systems in the Australian basin on the basis that they didn't receive an xxU identifier code. Just thought I would clear this up! [[User:ChocolateTrain|ChocolateTrain]] ([[User talk:ChocolateTrain|talk]]) 12:53, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|ChocolateTrain}} Hi, hi. You are right as well but please refer to [[Talk:2020–21 Australian region cyclone season#Subtropical low|this]] where Hink has gave his opinion about this system. It is not even a TL and it is very uncommon to find a subtropical low. -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 12:56, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

== Typhoon category ==
{| class="toccolours floatright"
|+ '''[[Japan Meteorological Agency|RSMC Tokyo]]'s Tropical&nbsp;Cyclone&nbsp;Intensity&nbsp;Scale'''
|-
! Category
! Sustained winds
|- style="background-color:#{{Storm colour|cat5}}"
! Violent Typhoon
| ≥105&nbsp;[[knot (unit)|knot]]s<br/>≥194&nbsp;km/h
|- style="background-color:#{{Storm colour|cat3}}"
! Very&nbsp;Strong Typhoon
| 85–104&nbsp;[[knot (unit)|knot]]s<br/>157–193&nbsp;km/h
|- style="background-color:#{{Storm colour|cat1}}"
! Strong&nbsp;Typhoon
| 64–84&nbsp;[[knot (unit)|knot]]s<br/>118–156&nbsp;km/h
|- style="background-color:#{{Storm colour|STS}}"
! Typhoon
| 34–63&nbsp;[[knot (unit)|knot]]s<br/>62–117&nbsp;km/h
|- style="background-color:#{{Storm colour|nwpdepression}}"
! Tropical&nbsp;Depression
| ≤33&nbsp;[[knot (unit)|knot]]s<br/>≤61&nbsp;km/h
|}
</noinclude>
:You want to put this scale in the article of [[List of strong typhoons#Background|Strong Typhoon]] ? <span style="color:#FF011A;">Dam222</span>  [[User:Dam222|🌋]] ([[User talk:Dam222|talk]]) 19:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
::{{ping|Dam22}} Hi! I would not mind it. At least perhaps just edit the template from Typhoon to Strong typhoon. The colours are not bad really. -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 01:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

== Happy Holidays! ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:0.5em 0.5em 0 0.5em; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">[[File:Happy Holidays (2135831016).jpg|206px|left]][[File:Arbuckle Bros. (3093003361).jpg|177px|right]][[File:Season's Greetings, Christmas Card from 320 Ranch.jpg|205px|left]]{{Center|[[File:Happy Holidays text.png|301px]]}}
'''Hello Typhoon2013:''' Enjoy the '''[[Christmas and holiday season|holiday season]]''', and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand [[Wikipedia]]. Cheers, [[User:CodingCyclone|𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎]] [[User talk:CodingCyclone|ᴛᴀʟᴋ]] 01:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
[[File:A book of country clouds and sunshine (1897), cropped.jpg|center|500px]]{{paragraph break}}{{-}}
</div>
{{paragraph break}}
:<div style="float:left">''{{resize|88%|Spread the WikiLove; use {{tls|Season's Greetings1}} to send this message}}''</div>{{-}} [[User:CodingCyclone|𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎]] [[User talk:CodingCyclone|ᴛᴀʟᴋ]] 01:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
::{{ping|CodingCyclone}} Hi and thank you so much! I hope you have a good holidays too! :) -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 01:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

== Happy holidays :) ==

--[[User:CyclonicallyDeranged|CyclonicallyDeranged]] ([[User talk:CyclonicallyDeranged|talk]]) 07:58, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

:{{ping|CyclonicallyDeranged}}! I hope you have a Merry Christmas and a good holidays to you too! It was nice working with you in areas this year and I am looking forward to working with you in the new year! :) -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 12:11, 25 December 2020 (UTC)


==Happy New Year!==
<div style="border:3.5px solid #FFD700; background-color:#FFFAE0; padding:0.1em 0.2em; height:auto; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);<!--
-->" class="plainlinks">
{{paragraph break}}
[[File:Golden star-rotating.gif|115px|left]]
[[File:Golden star-rotating.gif|115px|right]]
[[File:Merry Christmas and Happy New Year - 1908 Australian postcard.png|center|320px]]
[[File:Happy Holidays text.png|center|300px]]
{{paragraph break}}
<div style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:medium;">'''<u>Typhoon2013</u>,'''<br>'''Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a [[Happy New Year]] to you and yours!'''</span> '''~''' [[User:Destroyeraa|<span style="color:#00CCFF;">Destroyer</span>]][[User talk:Destroyeraa|🌀]][[Special:Contribs/Destroyeraa|🌀]] 18:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)</div>
----
{{paragraph break}}
<gallery mode=packed heights="130">
File:Fuochi d'artificio.gif
File:Baltimore and Ohio employees magazine (1912) (14573454469).jpg
File:SrenaNova.jpg
File:Happy New Year .jpg
File:Moscow State University fireworks.jpg
image:Fireworks_in_Jaén.jpg
File:Snow-man-1882635 1920.jpg
File:Charles R. Knight New Years's Card.jpg
File:Firecrackers lit by hand.jpg
File:"Wishing You a Prosperous and Happy New Year.".jpg
File:Town Hall at night, Inauguration of the Australian Commonwealth, Sydney, 1st January 1901, W. A. Gullick, Government Printer (5515745031).jpg
File:"New Year Greeting.".jpg
File:Hedvig Rosendahl - Christmas card1.jpg
File:Nystrom God-Jul 09.jpg
File:Nystrom God-Jul 17.jpg
File:Léva 1907.jpg
File:Arbuckle Bros. (3093003361).jpg
File:Season's Greetings, Christmas Card from 320 Ranch.jpg
File:NewYear postcard 1905 Germany1.jpg
File:A book of cheerful cats and other animated animals (1903) (14752756965).jpg
File:04 classical greek 4 elements fire.gif
</gallery></div>
:– <small>Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.</small>
::{{ping|Destroyeraa}} Thanks!! And you too as well! :) -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 11:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)