User talk:FrankRizzo2006

WikiProject View Askew Invite

Hello,

I noticed that you edited a Kevin Smith or View Askew Productions related article. Wikipedia currently has a View Askew WikiProject which aims to improve all Kevin Smith and View Askew related articles. You are free to join or can explore what the project is about by clicking here. Here are some other good links to help you get started with Wikipedia:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

WikiGuy86 (talk) 05:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Dollhouse Characters a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 12:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, FrankRizzo2006. You have new messages at Talk:Ip Man (film).
Message added 07:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ilyushka88 talk 07:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rachel Talalay

Template:Rachel Talalay has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ς ح д r خ є 02:26, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Blood (2010 film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bad Blood (2010 film), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.arclightfilms.com/labels/easternlight/new_films/bad-blood.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello FrankRizzo2006! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 0 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Dante Lam - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nansun Shi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation templates in film articles

Frank, I noticed that you have expanded directors' navigation templates to use where they wrote a screenplay for a film but did not necessarily direct. The three categories of navigation templates that we use in film articles are film series templates, franchise templates, and director templates. We do not provide navigation templates for the cast and crew beyond the director himself because that large number of people would create an excessive number of templates at the end of a single film article. I ask you to limit directors' navigation templates to the directed works. We should instead ensure that directors' other contributions are well-detailed on their individual articles. Erik (talk | contribs) 21:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

posters of the Chinese films - wikicommons

Hi FrankRizzo2006 , please next time upload the posters of the Chinese films to the wikicommons. That would also good if you upload the posters again to the wikicommons.

--Fihsdf (talk) 12:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

posters of the Chinese films - wikicommons

Studio field

Please stop making indiscriminate additions to the "studio" field in the infobox. The infobox is an overview, so please use common sense and recognize that most mainstream films have a primary studio behind it. It's excessive to list all the partners; it is of little value to readers and bloats the information. If a partnering production company had a specialized role in working with the primary studio, we can discuss the company and its actions in the article body. Erik (talk | contribs) 12:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review of The Mambo Kings

Hi,

I have reviewed you GAN The Mambo Kings at Talk:The Mambo Kings/GA1 and it has passed. Congratulations on a fine article!

I have made some relatively small copy edits that you may want to check.[1]

Again, congratulations!

Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 18:55, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bad Robot productions

Category:Bad Robot productions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Big Talk productions

Category:Big Talk productions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Happy Madison productions

Category:Happy Madison productions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:View Askew productions

Category:View Askew productions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wonderland Sound and Vision productions

Category:Wonderland Sound and Vision productions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:51, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 42 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don Burgess (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bond filmography

Many thanks for sorting out my cock up - its much appreciated! - SchroCat (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tales from the Hood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stray bullet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Miracle at St. Anna

Hi Frank, I've begun the review for Miracle at St. Anna and would like your thoughts on a few points. Thanks for your work on this, I think it's coming along quite well. -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:26, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		From one Marvel Comics fan to another, thanks for your contributions to bring Miracle at St. Anna to Good Article status. Keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply, but I thank you very much, Khazar2! I am deeply honored! -- FrankRizzo2006 (talk) 10:42, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:54, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Inside Man may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

helped prepared his actors by screening a number of [[heist film|heist-themed films]] including ''[Dog Day Afternoon'' (1975) and ''[[Serpico]]'' (1973). Washington, Ejiofor, [[Willem Dafoe]] and
inside-man-original-motion-picture-soundtrack| title = The Official Terence Blanchard Website > Discography > Inside Man (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack)| accessdate =July 1, 2013| work = The Official

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:34, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Inside Man

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Inside Man you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Inside Man

The article Inside Man you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Inside Man for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 05:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Inside Man

The article Inside Man you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Inside Man for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 20:17, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Studio field

I've never seen anyone divide the Studio field into different territories before, like the Distributor field in the infobox. One film is one production. The Studio field should not be divided in this way. - Gothicfilm (talk) 21:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interscope Communications, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Producer, The Hand That Rocks the Cradle and Bird on a Wire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Star East

The article Star East has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to be a notable corporation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of films featuring Navy SEALs

Hi, Jay. I am thinking about creating List of films featuring Navy SEALs which I would include in a "See also" section at Lone Survivor (film). This way, interested readers can find similar films. (I've created a few "List of films featuring..." articles as you can see on my user page.) Would that be alright? Would you want to help? Thanks, Erik (talk | contribs) 20:45, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Erik! Yes, I wouldn't mind creating a "See also" page for Lone Survivor, once you create the page. How about naming the article List of films featuring United States Navy SEALs instead? (similar to another page List of films featuring the United States Marine Corps) - SuperSonic2000 (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lone Survivor (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lone Survivor (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Onel5969 -- Onel5969 (talk) 04:01, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lone Survivor

You have done a great job on this article! Congratulations! Best,--NK (talk) 01:28, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! FrankRizzo (talk) 04:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I watch over this article, and someone added something to the "See also" section today. So I looked at it, and really, only the link to "List of films featuring the United States Navy SEALs" should be in that category, don't you think?Onel5969 (talk) 00:55, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lone Survivor (film)

The article Lone Survivor (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lone Survivor (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Onel5969 -- Onel5969 (talk) 03:51, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Raymond Wong (film presenter)#Requested move 24 January 2015

You have been involved in the article. I invite you to a move discussion. --George Ho (talk) 19:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Simple Plan (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Simple Plan (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 02:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Simple Plan (film)

The article A Simple Plan (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Simple Plan (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 03:01, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angel Heart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Evans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Angel Heart

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Angel Heart you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 21:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Film Award
		I, Cas Liber (talk · contribs), hereby award User:FrankRizzo2006 the WikiProject Film Award for his/her valued contributions on Angel Heart to WikiProject Film. Awarded 07:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

I think it has a chance at FAC...nice work. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Cas Liber!

Your GA nomination of Angel Heart

The article Angel Heart you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Angel Heart for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 07:21, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Edgar Ray Killen into Mississippi Burning. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Commitments (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mansion House, The Big Chill and Mustang Sally. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Burning

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mississippi Burning you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 04:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Burning

The article Mississippi Burning you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mississippi Burning for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 09:20, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Burning

The article Mississippi Burning you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mississippi Burning for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you for Evita!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your amazing work on Evita and even continuing to polish the article. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FrankRizzo, the phenomenal article Evita I have one input regarding the soundtrack section. I think that the whole development and recording can be shortened a little and couple or trio of sentences can be added to talk about the critical response and commercial aspects of the soundtrack. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar and kind words, IB ^{[ Poke ]}! I've taken your suggestions into consideration, and expanded on details regarding the release and reception of the soundtrack. FrankRizzo (talk) 15:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing that Frank. Maybe I have another minor suggestion. Like how the Madonna image in that particular section has some description, can we have similar one liner sentences for the other images? In that way they would not be there just as decorative items, but would also convey something from the article. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 07:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done! I've added details for the other images, IB ^{[ Poke ]}. FrankRizzo (talk) 00:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Evita (1996 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Evita (1996 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 05:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed the review and placed it on hold. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, FrankRizzo2006. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Commitments (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Commitments (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Super ninja2 -- Super ninja2 (talk) 00:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Evita (1996 film)

The article Evita (1996 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Evita (1996 film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 19:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Evita (1996 film)

The article Evita (1996 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Evita (1996 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 01:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on this Frank! This article is worthy of even FA class. Regarding the unfortunate removal of the image from the soundtrack section, maybe a cropped version of File:Andrea Ross-ALW-Nigel Wright-studio.jpg would be suitable? It shows both Andrew Lloyd Webber and the music producer Nigel Wright working in the studio. Should be appropriate. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 05:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, IB! I don't mind using a cropped version of the image. I have also nominated it to appear in Did you know, as per your suggestion.FrankRizzo (talk) 12:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FrankRizzo, the nomination is faulty, the page Template:Did you know nominations/Evita (1996 film) is completely empty and there is no hook present. Please review immediately. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 12:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed the nomination. What I need to know is whether you have previously taken any other articles to DYK. If so, then remember that those with 5 or more previous DYKs also need to provide QPQ (quid pro quo) reviews of other DYK nominations. See WP:Did you know#Eligibility criteria for more. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Snuggums, this is actually my first DYK nomination. FrankRizzo (talk) 04:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I've approved the nomination in response. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the thank you!

Howdy! I sure do appreciate all the hard work you must have put into the Fame article—and, by the looks of it, many other articles, too! Do you happen to have any other sources that we could add to the Christopher Gore (writer) article I just created? I could only find that one New York Times obit, and I figure with all the work you've done on the Fame article, you must have run across at least a bit of info about its writer. I'm particularly curious about... well, I have a stinking suspicion it's AIDS that did him in... Anyways, thank you for the thank you. And thanks again for all your hard work. Bobnorwal (talk) 05:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Bobnorwal for the awesome kind words! I didn't really stumble across a lot of articles regarding the life of Christopher Gore. Most of my research of came from a book entitled Inside Fame on Television by Michael A. Hoey. [2], which Gore's involvement with the film and television series. I also found a Chicago Tribune obituary, which might be helpful. The link is here. FrankRizzo (talk) 05:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those'll help a lot, thanks! I'm not interested in writing a novel-long article about him, but I do plan to at least add a bit more info and sources before moving on. (I hate leaving articles as stubs. It's like, what's the point, ya know?) Bobnorwal (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I don't mind making some contributions to the article.FrankRizzo (talk) 05:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Evita (1996 film)

On 10 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Evita (1996 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Madonna secured the lead in Evita after writing a four-page letter to director Alan Parker stating that she would be fully committed to the role? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Evita (1996 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Evita (1996 film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede 66 00:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:The Commitments (film)/GA1

FrankRizzo2006, I noticed that you closed down this review, which isn't something a nominator should be doing. I had already pinged Super ninja2, and once the obligatory seven days was over, I was going to pull the plug on it myself on January 26.

Normally, given how little the reviewer wrote and how it didn't address the GA criteria at all, I'd put in to have the page deleted, since it was effectively a non-review. But JerrySa1's addition did bring up a point that should be retained: there are a couple of places where the article text is uncomfortably close to this source. These are best addressed before you go looking for a new reviewer.

In particular, the source's "dramatic rehearsals in the mornings and music rehearsals in the afternoons" phrase should be reworked, as should "a live performance atmosphere for the vocalists to sing to. Each vocal was then recorded live onto a twenty-four track recorder".

It seemed to me that the Reception section had an overabundance of quotes, which can be a problem at GA. Indeed, some of them are so long that they should be formatted as blockquotes (rule of thumb per WP:Blockquote is that any quote 40 words or longer should be in a blockquote). More paraphrasing (but not close paraphrasing) should probably be done to reduce the quote density and length. Best of luck going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Commitments (film)

	Congratulations, it's a...
	...Wikipedia Good Article!! Shearonink (talk) 02:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Commitments (film)

The article The Commitments (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Commitments (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 02:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Shearonink, for reviewing the article!FrankRizzo (talk) 04:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

		The WikiProject Film Award
		I, MarnetteD\|Talk, hereby award FrankRizzo2006 the WikiProject Film Award for his/her valued contributions to WikiProject Film. Awarded For getting The Commitments to GA status. Congratulations!

Actually this should be the Mustang Sally barnstar :-) Such a wonderful film. I was lucky enough to see some of the members of the band when their tour stopped in Denver back in 2005. Thanks again for your work on that film's article and for everything else you do here at WikiP. MarnetteD|Talk 03:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very for the barnstar, and your contributions to the article, MarnetteD|Talk! Happy to have taken on the article in light of its 25th anniversary! It remains one of my favorite films!FrankRizzo (talk) 04:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome. 25 years already? It feels like it was only a couple months ago that I saw it in the theater. Where does the time go :-) Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 04:17, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fame (1980 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fame (1980 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 17:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fame (1980 film)

	Congratulations, it's a...
	...Wikipedia Good Article!! Shearonink (talk) 22:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for reviewing the article, Shearonink (talk)! FrankRizzo (talk) 00:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fame (1980 film)

The article Fame (1980 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fame (1980 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 22:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Birdy (film)

The article Birdy (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Birdy (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bluesphere -- Bluesphere (talk) 16:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Birdy (film) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Birdy (film)

On 12 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Birdy (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Birdy, the first feature film partially shot with the Skycam camera system, was described by a reviewer as "a heavy adult drama about best friends and the after-effects of war"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Birdy (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Birdy (film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

film workshop

Thank you for quality articles on films such as Miracle at St. Anna, Evita, The Commitments and Birdy, for your work on Presumed Innocent (film), for patiently looking for new solutions, and for a clear user page, - Frank, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate this! Thank you very much, Gerda Arendt (talk)! FrankRizzo (talk) 01:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 1612 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evita (1996 film)

I was wondering FrankRizzo, would you wanna take this article through FAC? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 07:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have. I am currently in the process of nominating the article for FAC status.FrankRizzo (talk) 23:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly Ian opposed the nomination now :( He was not happy with the spotchecks. Do you want me to go through them once? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 05:02, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure.FrankRizzo (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We have to go through all the references and check that they tally with the content. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 05:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@IndianBio: I've been checking the sources for the past few days. So far every source appears to be in sync with content in the article.FrankRizzo (talk) 06:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Its not only that Frank, what Ian's concern is that there is still close adherence to the original source, as the examples that he gave. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:19, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have made attempts to address Ian's comments, especially in past edits to the article. I could use some help on this.FrankRizzo (talk) 04:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on taking this to FA. :) —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 16:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@IndianBio: Thanks! And thank you for your help and contributions! FrankRizzo (talk) 19:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	This is for getting Evita (1996 film) to FA status, quite an admirable feat. Many congratulations! FrB.TG (talk) 19:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! FrankRizzo (talk) 23:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another film article improved by your efforts FrankRizzo2006. I have to agree with Gerta's statement above - You are an awesome Wikipedian!!! Thanks so much for your efforts. MarnetteD|Talk 23:40, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MarnetteD: I truly appreciate the kind words! Thank you! FrankRizzo (talk) 00:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Presumed Innocent (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Presumed Innocent (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daß Wölf -- Daß Wölf (talk) 18:40, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Presumed Innocent (film)

The article Presumed Innocent (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Presumed Innocent (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daß Wölf -- Daß Wölf (talk) 02:20, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Presumed Innocent (film)

The article Presumed Innocent (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Presumed Innocent (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daß Wölf -- Daß Wölf (talk) 02:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Good Article Nominations Page Needs Your Help!

Good Articles: Film needs the help of willing reviewers!

Hi there. You nominated an article for evaluation against the good article criteria some time ago, but I noticed you have yet to review an article yourself. Although it's not mandatory, it would be helpful if every user who creates a nomination also reviewed at least one other article, as this would help clear the massive backlog. Reviewing someone else's article can also help you in the long run: every article reviewed brings yours one position closer to the top of the nominations list! If you worked on the article you nominated, chances are you're already familiar with the six good article criteria. It really isn't hard to review, and may take an experienced editor only a few hours to complete. If you have the time and would like to help, please click here, take a moment to figure out which article you'd like to review, then click on its (start review) button. Thank you for reading, and if you need assistance with your review at any point, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page and I'll respond to you as soon as I can. Slightlymad (talk) 09:06, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Sparrow (film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Sparrow (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.fcat.es/peliculas/al-asfour/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, FrankRizzo2006. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shoot the Moon

Hello, FrankRizzo, would you like me to take up the film's GA review? — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would! Thank you very much. FrankRizzo (talk) 22:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Left comments at the article's GAR in case you did not receive my ping.

— Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:56, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have you resolved my comments? Do reply at the GAR if you have done so. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 16:41, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've put the article's GAR on hold. You've got 7 days to expand and improve the critical reception section.

— Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Slightlymad has posted some more comments at the GAR. Do attend to them.

— Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 10:04, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shoot the Moon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shoot the Moon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 15:01, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shoot the Moon

The article Shoot the Moon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shoot the Moon for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 07:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shoot the Moon

The article Shoot the Moon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shoot the Moon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Evita (1996 film) scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that I've scheduled Evita (1996 film) to appear on the main page as today's featured article on 16 August 2018. If you need to make tweaks to the blurb, it is at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 16, 2018. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations FrankRizzo! —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, IndianBio!FrankRizzo (talk) 07:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Born on the Fourth of July (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Born on the Fourth of July (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JohnWickTwo -- JohnWickTwo (talk) 04:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Star Is Born (2018 film)

Hey Frank how are you? Can I ask you to take a look at the above article since you have expertise on film-related topics? There are a number of sources listed in the talk page and the film is gaining traction in the award circuit from the news I'm reading. But I don't understand how to structure the content available. Can you help a bit? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, IndianBio. Sorry for the late reply, but, yes I would love to lend a helping hand on the article! Going to have to multitask a bit since I'm trying to get Born on the Fourth of July to GA status! I've noticed that Entertainment Weekly's website is hyping the film, especially on the chemistry between Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga, so I will probably start there. 00:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Hey Frank, would really love if you can lend a bit of hand to the article. I'm getting confused as to what goes where and trying to model it after the Evita article (the best haha). —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:23, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Born on the Fourth of July (film)

The article Born on the Fourth of July (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Born on the Fourth of July (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JohnWickTwo -- JohnWickTwo (talk) 04:23, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Born on the Fourth of July (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, FrankRizzo2006. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Money for Nothing (1993 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Money for Nothing (1993 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LM150 -- LM150 (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Money for Nothing (1993 film)

The article Money for Nothing (1993 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Money for Nothing (1993 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LM150 -- LM150 (talk) 18:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cruel and Unusual Films films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Cruel and Unusual Films films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dominicmgm (talk) 03:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Big Talk Productions films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Big Talk Productions films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 04:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]